Search for: "MacE v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
The court ignored the fact that the tactic also dramatically increased the potential recovery by the class because of the quirk in the FDCPA.In response to the court's order to show cause, counsel cites Mace v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 10:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Mace is, in fact, legal in all 50 states, and the Court sees no reason why mace would not also be constitutionally protected.] [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm by Russell Mace
According to the South Carolina Judicial Department, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision in State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Mace said that Austin was not following instructions and she should come see Mace. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Divisions said that this argument was unavailing in light of his disciplinary history, citing Gomez v Kelly, 55 AD3d 305, reversed 12 NY3d 883 [Gomez I].In Gomez I the Appellate Division said that substantial evidence supported the findings that Gomez violated [1] his commanding officer's order to terminate his involvement in a criminal investigation; [2] failed to take possession of drugs during a police department integrity test; [3] failed to voucher his helmet,… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:34 am
  The Table of Contents for Volume 65 are as follows: Validity, Construction, and Application of State Sex Offender Registration Statutes Concerning Level of Classification—Initial Classification Determination When Does the Use of Pepper Spray, Mace, or Other Similar Chemical Irritants Constitute Violation of Constitutional Rights Pretrial Discovery in Disciplinary Proceedings Against Physician Preemption of State Regulation of Weapons… [read post]