Search for: "MacKie v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2017, 9:04 am
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 12:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
Facts of R v Mackie MacKie pleaded guilty to 39 offences, all of which involved crimes against children. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:24 pm
(To catch up with the extraordinary history of the predatory, unlawful secured lending of Mr Gopee’s many and various companies, the many possession proceedings and the complicated current court cases, see here, or the July 2014 summary of HHJ Mackie QC) Gopee & Ors v London Mercantile Court [2015] EWCA Civ 944 When last we saw Mr Gopee, the position was as set out in HHJ Mackie QC’s July 2014 summary. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 11:47 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:11 am
In the case of W v Veolia Environmental Services (UK) PLC [2011] EWHC 2020 (QB), Judge Mackie QC was asked to consider the validity of a claim for damages. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 2:32 pm
The United States case. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:00 am
The post <em>Wilson et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:25 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cayzer v Beddow [2007] EWCA Civ 644 (29 June 2007) Beckett Investment Management Group Ltd & Ors v Hall & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 613 (28 June 2007) Hall & Anor v The First Secretary of State [2007] EWCA Civ 612 (28 June 2007) Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Mackie [2007] EWCA Civ 642 (28 June 2007) South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council v Anderson &… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:11 am
While litigating Briscoe v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
(Mackie v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
In Aizkir Navigation Inc v Al Wathba National Insurance [2011] EWHC 3940 (Comm), the High Court considered a principle of contractual construction and held that a clause stating that claims "be settled in accordance with English Law and practice shall be so settled in Abu Dhabi (UAE)" amounted to an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of the United Arab Emirates (the UAE) and there was no overwhelming reason to displace that jurisdiction clause.The Claimant, Aizkir,… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:07 pm
The parties in the Mackie v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:19 pm
In McCormick v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
Mackie, __ M.J. ___, No. 08-5005/AF (C.A.A.F. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:56 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:38 am
Regarding the cause of the fire, Judge Mackie QC noted that it was for Zurich to show that Mr Yeganeh had started the fire deliberately, and that it must bring clear evidence for this given the seriousness of the allegation. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Mackie v. [read post]
