Search for: "MacPherson v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2011, 6:05 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
When the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released the decision in Kusnierz v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 9:35 am by Victoria Craig
From a parenting perspective, while the case of Douglas v Douglas, 2020 ONSC 2160 (which was heard on March 25, 2020, not long after the Superior Court of Justice and Ontario Court of Justice regular operations were initially suspended as a result of COVID-19) seemed to indicate that matters where one parent has reduced the other’s parenting time as a result of COVID-19 would not be considered urgent unless there was an existing court order, the… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
But two of the appeal court judges, justices James MacPherson and Eleanore Cronk, disagreed with the ruling on communicating in public for the purposes of prostitution. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:23 am by Robert Tanha
MacPherson cited Bastarache J in the Supreme Court decision of Honda Canada Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 7:56 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in R. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:00 pm by Ken Krupat
TDI Canada Ltd., Justice MacPherson, was on the panel in this case of Musoni v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am by Legal Beagle
DC Gow indicated that she would discuss matters with her superior officer but that a search warrant might be sought.[5]        On 11 July 2016, in anticipation that an application for a warrant might be made, Mr Watson, on behalf of S wrote to the Sheriff Clerk in Edinburgh requesting that the Sheriff Clerk contact the complainers in the event of any application to the sheriff with a view to S being represented at any hearing before the sheriff. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Best, the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, held that a third party, who had knowledge that the motorist they were texting was driving at a time the parties were exchanging text messages, could be found liable for any resulting damages. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
That one way is spelled out, in very clear words, in Article V of ECUSA's Constitution, and it has not changed in over 200 years. [read post]