Search for: "Machinists Local v. Labor Board" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2017, 6:28 am by Joy Waltemath
” There, she noted, the Board “restated its joint employer standard and reaffirmed its commitment to the standard articulated by the Third Circuit in NLRB v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
USDOL/OALJ Reporter Decisions of the Administrative Review Board February 2015 See Case summaries:   International Assoc. of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, ARB No. 13-086 (ARB Feb. 27, 2015) Final Decision and Order PDF Summary: The ARB summarily affirmed the Principal Deputy Administrator’s determination that the Employer did not violation the Service Contract Act by refusing to promote workers employed as flight service specialists and pay a higher wage. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:57 am
If environmental preemption becomes just as draconian as Machinist labor law preemption in Brown, then this nation's policy-making will slowly ossify into a dirigiste sclerosis worthy of France. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 7:18 am by Joy Waltemath
A year after the dealership implemented its 2010 employee handbook, the local Machinists union charged that numerous of its provisions were unlawful and interfered with the union’s organizing efforts. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:52 pm
Charges were filed by Machinists District Lodge 190 and Local 1101; the complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(1), (3), and (5). [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
The election resulted in 1 vote for Operating Engineers Local 150, 0 votes for Laborers Local 681, and 1 vote for no Union, making the two challenged ballots outcome-determinative. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm by Schachtman
National Labor Relations Board, 906 F.2d 1428 (10th Cir. 1990). [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board found it unnecessary to pass on certain of the judge's unfair labor practice findings, including some that were not alleged in the complaint, because the additional violations would be cumulative and would not affect the remedy. [read post]