Search for: "Mackie v. Mackie"
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2013, 9:34 am
Barons Finance Ltd & Reddy Corporation Ltd v Makanju [2013] EWHC 153 (QB) was an application for permission to appeal, brought by Mr Makanju, against a possession order made against him in 2009.Mr Makanju was the leasehold owner of a flat. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K Sanction On… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
Further, HHJ Mackie found that there was virtually no factual connection with England, given that the parties, brokers and managers were either in the UAE or Egypt, and that Abu Dhabi was clearly and distinctly the most appropriate forum. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 5:37 am
The quantum of the insurer's liability turned on the proper construction of this expression.In the course of his judgment, Judge Mackie QC commented that Section 16(3) of the MIA provides that the insurable value of goods or merchandise which form the subject matter of an insurance contract is the "prime cost of the property insured, plus the expenses of and incidental to shipping and the charges of insurance upon the whole". [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:19 pm
In McCormick v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:13 am
Bettag v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
Mackie. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:11 am
In the case of W v Veolia Environmental Services (UK) PLC [2011] EWHC 2020 (QB), Judge Mackie QC was asked to consider the validity of a claim for damages. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:50 am
In this case Judge Mackie said: "26. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:26 am
DickensonDirectors’ Liability: The Case of Directorial Responsibility Following Roberts v Frohlich by Francis Mackie, Rhys Davies and Alexandra TownsleyNew Jersey and Indiana Join New York and Florida in Relaxing Credit for Reinsurance Collateral Requirements by Nick R. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:27 am
Last week’s solitary opinion came in Montana v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:14 am
In yesterday’s case (Mackie v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:56 am
In SunTrust Bank N.A. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:56 am
In SunTrust Bank N.A. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:07 pm
The parties in the Mackie v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:11 am
While litigating Briscoe v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
(Mackie v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:34 am
Mackie). [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:09 pm
I am proud to announce that this past Wednesday, a federal jury returned a verdict in the case of Burroughs v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:38 am
Regarding the cause of the fire, Judge Mackie QC noted that it was for Zurich to show that Mr Yeganeh had started the fire deliberately, and that it must bring clear evidence for this given the seriousness of the allegation. [read post]
