Search for: "Maddox v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 11:43 am
United States (1964), the U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
In Maddox v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
(citing Maddox v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
This is not a case where the state judges were confused about the law or overlooked key evidence, as in Taylor v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:15 am
Banigan & Templin, et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
Maddox, 2014 U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which applies to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits the use of excessive force by policemen in the course of an arrest, see, e.g., Graham v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 3:07 am
That court is probably more friendly to plaintiffs -- and less sympathetic to defendants with deep pockets -- than a state trial court in Mississippi. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:46 pm
The Court first applied the "sole cause" requirement, as found in the Rehabilitation Act in a footnote in Maddox v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:38 pm
Durst's Adm'x, 35 Tex. 421, 423 (1871); Jim Maddox Props., LLC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:41 pm
The Court of Appeals overturned the ratification of a foreclosure sale because the notice of sale included a $295 fee that, according to homeowner Bonnie Maddox, had become common practice by “one or more law firms that specialize in foreclosure practice” throughout the state. [read post]
8 Jun 2006, 7:07 am
Maddox, G-d rest her soul, got away with $50,000 in goods and services that Mather provided. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 9:27 am
––Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no pet.); see also Maddox v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
State of Maryland). [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:30 am
Maddox’ any-exposure opinion is in irreconcilable conflict with itself”); Free v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am
Ohio and NAACP v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am
Maddox, which both involved police officers and reached differing conclusions, arguably producing a circuit split. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:22 am
I, II, III, IV and V. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:53 am
Maddox, 366 F.3d 992, 1008 (9th Cir. 2004). [read post]
