Search for: "Maddox v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
This is not a case where the state judges were confused about the law or overlooked key evidence, as in Taylor v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Richard Renner
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which applies to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits the use of excessive force by policemen in the course of an arrest, see, e.g., Graham v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 3:07 am
That court is probably more friendly to plaintiffs -- and less sympathetic to defendants with deep pockets -- than a state trial court in Mississippi. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:46 pm by Lisa Whittaker
The Court first applied the "sole cause" requirement, as found in the Rehabilitation Act in a footnote in Maddox v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:41 pm by Danny Jacobs
The Court of Appeals overturned the ratification of a foreclosure sale because the notice of sale included a $295 fee that, according to homeowner Bonnie Maddox, had become common practice by “one or more law firms that specialize in foreclosure practice” throughout the state. [read post]
8 Jun 2006, 7:07 am
Maddox, G-d rest her soul, got away with $50,000 in goods and services that Mather provided. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am by Ruthann Robson
Maddox, which both involved police officers and reached differing conclusions, arguably producing a circuit split. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:53 am by Albert Wan
 Maddox, 366 F.3d 992, 1008 (9th Cir. 2004). [read post]