Search for: "Maddox v. United States" Results 21 - 30 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am by Ruthann Robson
  Lane is not the only one to argue that the Eleventh Circuit’s categorical exclusion of First Amendment protection for subpoenaed testimony is incorrect:  the Solicitor General, representing the United States as an amicus, agrees with him. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Like the United States Supreme Court, there are few cases the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is required to hear; instead, the court decides, at its discretion, which appeals from the intermediate appellate courts it wants to hear. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
Maddox and Laman attempt to “extrapolate down,” reasoning that if high dose exposure is [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
  This argument was rejected by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in In re Meruelo Maddox Properties, Inc., 2012 WL 248167 (9th Cir. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 2:45 am by Editor Charlie
AFTRA is a member of the AFL-CIO, which is the largest federation of unions in the United States with over 10 million members. [read post]