Search for: "Madrid v. Justice Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2009, 1:51 am
Vicente Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA; Case C-277/08 Court of Justice of the European Communities “National provisions or collective agreements which provided that a worker who was sick during a period of scheduled annual leave did not have the right, after his recovery, to take his annual leave at another time were unlawful. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Madrid. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 9:00 am
Madrid and Pereida v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:49 am
Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court in Torres v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:59 am
When the Supreme Court heard argument recently in Torres v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:54 am
Employers have to repay sick pay Some good news for employees came out last week with the decision by the European Court of Justice in Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA that says if an employee is sick whilst on holiday, they can retake the holiday later on or carry the days lost over to the next [...] [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Carlos Espósito (University Autónoma of Madrid - Law) has posted Jus Cogens and Jurisdictional Immunities of States at the International Court of Justice: A Conflict Does Exist (Italian Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 21, 2012). [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 10:28 pm
Carlos Espósito (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Law) has posted Of Plumbers and Social Architects: Elements and Problems of the Judgment of the International Court of Justice in Jurisdictional Immunities of States (Journal of International Dispute Settlement, forthcoming). [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:08 pm
In the oral argument of Torres v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 10:03 am
The US Supreme Court ruled 5-3 Thursday in Torres v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:02 am
Justice Elena Kagan delivered the opinion of the Court in Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:47 am
Madrid and Pereida v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:41 am
The second decision came in Torres v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:00 am
In a 5-3 decision in Thomas v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:49 am
Madrid (March 30): What it means to be “seized” for purposes of the Fourth Amendment’s ban on unreasonable seizures Pereida v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:43 pm
On Thursday, the Court decided Torres v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:22 pm
The case, Torres v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 3:00 pm
Gözze Frottierweberei Gmbh, Wolfgang Gözze GmbH v Verein Bremer Baumwollbörse, case C-689/15, the European Court of Justice analyzes an issue which the EUTMR rules do not clearly resolve, i.e. whether or not a licensed EUTM registration may be invalidated if the owner fails to carry out quality controls on licensee/licensees’ products.MARQUES Class 46In Close Thais with Madrid, as from November, MARQUES reproduces the official WIPO notice… [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Quoting another Supreme Court case, Graham v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:32 pm
Specifically, the case involved the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art Foundation (Mass MoCA) Foundation in North Adams and Christoph Büchelis, a Swiss installation artist.Kluwer Copyright Blog has posted about the outcome of the Court of Justice of the European Union's decision in Case C-401/19 - Poland v. [read post]
