Search for: "Madrid v. Justice Court" Results 61 - 80 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2017, 2:16 pm by Marta Requejo
It is edited by the Private International Law Department of the University Carlos III, Madrid. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 3:00 pm
Gözze Frottierweberei Gmbh, Wolfgang Gözze GmbH v Verein Bremer Baumwollbörse, case C-689/15, the European Court of Justice analyzes an issue which the EUTMR rules do not clearly resolve, i.e. whether or not a licensed EUTM registration may be invalidated if the owner fails to carry out quality controls on licensee/licensees’ products.MARQUES Class 46In Close Thais with Madrid, as from November, MARQUES reproduces the official WIPO notice… [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
Queiroz, University of São Paulo, Law School  ·         Justice in the Ibero-American World: from the Enlightenment to the Independence Age—Andréa Slemian, UNIFESP   ·         The revolutionary Constitution of 1917 in Mexico. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 4:56 am by Matthias Weller
Fernando Gascón Inchausti, Complutense de Madrid, continued the deep reflections on comparative procedural law with a view to the EU and illustrated the relevance in case law both of the European Court of Justice as well as the European Court of Human Rights and in the EU’s law-making and evaluations of existing instruments, see recently e.g. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Kenya Former Chief Justice Willy Mutunga is seeking defamation damages from the Standard Group for allegedly publishing libelous stories about his divorce case. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court On 14 February 2017 there was a statement in open court in the case of Taylor v Northamptonshire County Council. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 1:32 am
 A look at the proposal for the ePrivacy RegulationFormer Guest Kat Valentina Torelli, now associated with FJF Legal in Madrid, has graciously continued her coverage and commentary on EU developments in the area of privacy, this time in connection with the ePrivacy Regulation.BGH: to cease means to recallMark Schweizer would like to bring the attention of the German Readers a recent decision (published 13 January 2017) of the Federal Court of Justice… [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:58 pm
| Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co Limited | Book review: Copyright and E-Learning | Friday Fantasies | Fontem see their patent “vaporised” – the dangers of added matter | BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous priorities | Around the IP blogs | AIPPI Congress Report 5: Antitrust and Pharma - seeking a balance | When the Rolling Stones visited 2120 South Michigan Avenue in Chicago | No measure of success in passing off… [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
Justice Birss’s rulings in Varian Medical Systems AG v (1) Elekta Limited; and (2) Elekta Holdings Limited [2016] EWHC 2679 (Pat) cases. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm
Copyright scholars, sociologists and lawyers will find useful the interdisciplinary analysis of graffiti, from a legal, historical and sociological points of view.Mr Justice Carr's decision in Victoria Plumb is about Adwords (honest)Jeremy Blum and Andrew Butcher discuss Victoria Plum Limited v Victorian Plumbing Ltd, [2016] EWHC 2911 (Ch), involving trademark infringement, honest concurrent use defense and passing off in the context of Pay per Click (PPC) bidding on… [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
No problem, here is the 124th edition of Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.Festive Feline Level 100Rocket in the Patents Court: Napp Pharmaceutical v Dr Reddy's and SandozThe case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Court of Justice answer (typical): it depends. [read post]
The court noted that this qualified the dicta of Lord Hope in Dabas v High Court of Justice in Madrid, Spain [2007] UKHL 6, which had rejected the proposition that the validity of an EAW could “be eked out by extraneous information,” where the requirements set out in s 2(2) of the 2003 Act were concerned. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
The horror comes not merely from the subject of the listing but from its banality, the reduction of its components to ritualized actions whose principle interest in in its aggregation ("In Italia seicento e quaranta; In Alemagna duecento e trentuna; Cento in Francia, in Turchia novantuna; Ma in Ispagna son già mille e tre"), without regard to rank, value or societal impact ("E v'han donne d'ogni grado, D'ogni forma, d'ogni età"), and in… [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:50 am by Priya Magar
In 2009, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) in the cases of Stringer and Others v HM Revenue & Customs and Pereda v Madrid Movilidad established the following principles: Workers who are off work on sick leave continue to accrue annual leave Workers can take holiday during sick leave, however if they are unable or do not wish to do so, they can take it at a different time, even if this means carrying it over to the next holiday year… [read post]