Search for: "Maine v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,000
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Palomar Health v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm
Federated Mutual Insurance Company, San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:35 am
” On appeal, Judge Berdote Byrne of the Superior Court concluded that the first contention holds little weight, but the second contention has merit and warrants reversal. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Voting is now open! [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:54 am
This rule applies both to their contacts with the public and to their working relationships with hierarchical superiors and colleagues” [15]. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Compagnie d’arrimage de Québec ltée, 2023 QCCA 973 dismissed the appeal from a decision of the Quebec Superior Court that had rejected a class action on the merits seeking compensation in relation to the presence of large amounts of dust near the Port of Quebec.[1] The Court of Appeal’s decision is significant for two main reasons: (1) it reiterates the necessity of demonstrating a material contribution when proving causation in cases… [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Arizona – Two Groups Making New Bid to Hide Names of Donors in Political Races Arizona Capitol Times – Howard Fischer (Capitol News Services) | Published: 11/7/2023 Attorney Scott Freeman acknowledges that Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Scott McCoy rejected his bid to void Proposition 211. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 11:57 am
Compagnie d'arrimage de Québec ltée, 2023 QCCA 973 dismissed the appeal from a decision of the Quebec Superior Court that had rejected a class action on the merits seeking compensation in relation to the presence of large amounts of dust near the Port of Quebec.[1] The Court of Appeal’s decision is significant for two main reasons: (1) it reiterates the necessity of demonstrating a material contribution when proving causation in cases… [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Such candies include the main active ingredient linked to the psychedelic effects of cannabis – the plant from which marijuana is derived. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm
In ruling that the Superior Court correctly concluded that the management liability insurance policy’s professional services exclusion did not preclude coverage for the underlying investigation and claim, the Court first considered a case out of the Eastern District of Louisiana, IberiaBank Corp. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 7:00 am
Judicial deference to administrative interpretation of statutes may arise where three main preconditions are met. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In general, the main proposals are based on long-discredited approaches to public control of competitive markets—micromanagement of specific practices such as “self-preferencing,” product “bundling,” or competing with customers. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
From Griffin v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 3:02 am
Accordingly, the court reversed the judgment of the Superior Court and remanded with direction to sustain the plaintiff’s appeal and to order the commission to hold a hearing on the plaintiff’s application. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
See, e.g., Jack Michael Beermann, Major Questions, Delegation, Chevron and the Anti-Innovation Supreme Court at 8 (March 9, 2023) (“This article also illustrates how the Court is doing a poor job providing clear instructions to lower courts and other government entities on how and in some cases even whether to apply its doctrines. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm
After the Supreme Court invalidated the use of race in college admissions in SFFA v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
At the Atlantic, Adam Serwer critiques Justice Thomas's analysis of the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause in the Court's Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 3:44 pm
The post Case Review – On Point Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
Superior Court, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a non-resident defendant may be subject to personal jurisdiction in a state in virtue of having been served with process while physically present within the state, even apart from any other contacts the defendant has or doesn't have with the forum state. [read post]
