Search for: "Maine v. Superior Court" Results 81 - 100 of 999
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2009, 11:37 am by Adrianos Facchetti
The California Court of Appeal, Sixth District, answered this question in Sheppard v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:49 pm
Last Friday, the Pennsylvania Superior Court (an intermediate appellate court in Pennsylvania) issued a long awaited (some three years long) decision in the Baycol case, Pauley v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 11:44 am
  But, the Court highlighted that the main contract governing the claims in litigation did not. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
The main thrust of the article is to argue that Pioneer Electronics implicitly approved Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:16 am by Heather Donkers
It was on appeal from a conviction entered by McIsaac J. of the Superior Court, sitting with a jury in 2013, and from the sentence imposed that same year. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” The federal Court of Appeals pointed out that it is not bound by a Maine Superior Court decision because a Maine Superior Court decision does not bind the Maine Law Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:25 am by John W. Arden
The action was filed in New Hampshire Superior Court and removed to the federal district court in Concord. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” The federal Court of Appeals pointed out that it is not bound by a Maine Superior Court decision because a Maine Superior Court decision does not bind the Maine Law Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:38 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ashask suggests that in some circumstances an electronic signature may provide and contain additional information that is useful to the court, and can therefore be superior than traditional methods. [read post]