Search for: "Major v. Hampton" Results 1 - 20 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
New York, the line-item veto case in which Justices Scalia, O’Connor, and Breyer dissented, and (to a lesser extent) of the majority opinion in Hampton v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:04 am by Susan Brenner
  The majority found that the suppression of the iPad was not dispositive of the case. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
You will find beyond a doubt that PQI's education services will elevate you above the vast majority of Americans in knowledge and financial freedoms. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 9:16 am by LTA-Editor
By Sam Hampton This month, the streaming television service provider Aereo suffered a second major legal defeat. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:05 am by Kedar S. Bhatia
Hampton County Election Commission (1985), Justices Powell and Rehnquist concurred again in the judgment without authoring an opinion. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm by Stephen McAllister
Hampton Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Kansas School of Law. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 10:49 am by Unknown
H.R.2809 - To authorize the President to provide disaster assistance to States and Indian Tribes under a major disaster recovery program, and for other purposes. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 4:58 pm by Mark Tushnet
The truth-in-labeling requirement might be found in the Line Item Veto decision coupled with Hampton v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:38 am by Gritsforbreakfast
She convinced a majority of CCA judges to side with her against Charlie Baird, but the following year the Legislature created the state's DNA testing statute in rebuke (Ch. 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure). [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:47 pm by Patty Salkin
East Hampton Indoor Tennis Club, LLC v Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of East Hampton, 2011 WL 1499663 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. 4/19/2011) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/calendar/webcal/decisions/2011/D30900.pdf Filed under: Accessory Uses, Current Caselaw - New York [read post]