Search for: "Majors v. Smith"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,009
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2025, 6:45 am
Smith. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 2:23 pm
In our last update, we reported that despite the Supreme Court staying the nationwide injunction against FinCEN’s enforcement of the CTA in one Texas case, a nationwide stay of the Reporting Rule granted by a federal judge in the Eastern District in Smith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 4:30 am
Verner and Wisconsin v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 11:28 am
Pam Karlan: After the Supreme Court decided Trump v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm
Notably, it undermines cases like Tornetta v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
Even if a majority of a corporation’s board is truly independent, demand futility is generally determined on a motion to dismiss. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
For good reason, Professor Price is no admirer of several recent decisions of the Court, including those involving the “major questions” doctrine and, even more, the remarkably obtuse decisions involving the alleged meaning of the Second Amendment in the 21st century. [read post]
16 Feb 2025, 11:20 am
" New York v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 4:56 am
Melanie Zanona, Frank Thorp V, and Garrett Haake report for NBC News. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 10:37 am
Vetter v Resnick Doc 28Download Vetter-v. [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 7:51 am
This could be used to support the authors argument that the more coherent conceptualization of genericness is as ab-initio vs. ex-post invalidation.Prior uses of the term "abandonment"One of the major contributions of the paper is to highlight the difference between truly voluntary abandonment of an IP right, on the one hand, and the failure of an IP right to meet substantive criteria, on the other. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 8:06 am
State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 5:24 pm
WWE v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 2:55 pm
Sineneng-Smith, 590 U.S. 371, 375 (2020); Marin Audubon Soc'y v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 12:43 pm
Renowned civil rights litigator Marshall Krause tells the story of Camara v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 5:28 am
He has even broader immunity under the Supreme Court’s holding in Trump v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am
Writing for the majority, Judge J. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 4:00 am
The bulk of the report addresses two issues: (a) it painstakingly explains why Trump's conduct was criminal and prosecutable, even after the Supreme Court's immunity ruling in Trump v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm
While accepting that there has been a shift from color-blind v. race-conscious to protect v. repair, Fleming and McClain query how “fundamental” this change is. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 11:23 am
Trump’s Ellipse Speech incited the violence at the Capitol on January 6 and could satisfy the Supreme Court’s standard for ‘incitement’ under Brandenburg v. [read post]