Search for: "Manchester v. Phillips" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 6:24 am by Blog Editorial
“On 1 July, the appellants, Greater Manchester Police, filed an application inviting the Supreme Court to stay the effect of the High Court’s judgment. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
Phillip Tillet v The Queen (Belize), heard 9 June 2011. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 5:02 pm
The best so far of course is from the wonderful Jeremy Phillips: From Jeremy Phillips, IP Consultant, Olswang LLP* 'Three strikes' proposals, even if enacted, will be shown to be feeble, cosmetic inconveniences. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 2:34 pm by Charon QC
ZAM v CFW & TFW: “suing for libel in secret” On Hyperinjunctions: John Hemming MP: abuse of power, and privilege   I’d like to thank Lawtel, Westlaw,  Cassons For Counsel, City University Law School,  David Phillips & Partners Solicitors, Inksters Solicitors,  Iken, LBC Wise Counsel, Carrs Solicitors,  JMW Solicitors – Manchester, Pannone and Cellmark for sponsoring the podcast  – and the free student… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:02 am by Charon QC
*** In association with The Lawyer I’d like to thank Lawtel, Westlaw,  Cassons For Counsel, City University Law School,  David Phillips & Partners Solicitors, Inksters Solicitors,  Iken, LBC Wise Counsel, Carrs Solicitors,  JMW Solicitors – Manchester, Pannone and Cellmark for sponsoring the podcast  – and the free student materials on Insite Law – appreciated. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 12:37 pm
empress_of_sytheria - Mercedes McCombZenferret - Michael Simon, FLInnosed - Bonnie LangHoney - Meghan RadickCookie - Donna Underwood - ALMoseyanme - Christine Keens - Alexandria, VAWinryRockbell - Rebecca Jackson KennedyInterpid Reporter - Jill Phillips - GASummer Breeze - Judy H. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:00 am by Charon QC
Listen to the podcast *** Brodie Clark’s tribunal claim – and Parliamentary privilege Carl Gardner analyses – in great detail – the Parliamentary privilege point we discussed in the podcast – a good read. *** In association with The Lawyer I’d like to thank Lawtel, Westlaw,  Cassons For Counsel, City University Law School,  David Phillips & Partners Solicitors, Inksters Solicitors,  Iken, LBC Wise Counsel, Carrs Solicitors,  JMW… [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm by Charon QC
Insurance: http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2011/03/01/is-car-insurance-discrimination-ruling-completely-bonkers/ Contempt of Court: http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2011/03/07/avoiding-contempt-of-court-tips-for-bloggers-and-tweeters/ http://inforrm.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/case-law-a-g-v-associated-newspapers-online-contempt-alex-bailin-qc/ Libel reform: http://www.senseaboutscience.org.uk/PDF/What%20should%20a%20defamation%20bill%20contain.pdf I’d like to thank Lawtel, Westlaw, … [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Burset, Notre Dame Law School, have updated their paper on Entick v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Charon QC
UKSC judgment: 30 May 2012 Assange (Appellant) v The Swedish Prosecution Authority (Respondent) Judgment (PDF) Press summary (PDF)   *** I’d like to thank Lawtel, Westlaw,  Cassons For Counsel, City University Law School,  David Phillips & Partners Solicitors, Inksters Solicitors,  Iken, LBC Wise Counsel, Carrs Solicitors,  JMW Solicitors – Manchester, Pannone and Cellmark for sponsoring the  the free student materials on… [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:12 pm
On March 4, 2008, IPBiz received a comment to an earlier post What Gettysburg teaches us about KSR v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  Sequel to Manchester v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45: Article 8 ECHR requires Court to consider proportionality before granting any possession order against a home R v Forsyth and Mabey [2011] UKSC 9. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:50 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  Single majority judgments,  an innovation which the Supreme Court has embraced, should be preferred in the appellate courts – and his Lordship gave the example of Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (application of Article 8 to housing possession cases, reported on this blog here) , in which Lord Phillips “was anxious that there was only only judgment, given the importance of clear guidance in such a case”). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] UKSC 6 (9 February 2011): Supreme Court updates Pinnock (article 8 and council possession) judgment, re order and costs. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by NL
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by NL
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]