Search for: "Mann v. Mann" Results 1 - 20 of 1,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am by INFORRM
The first approach is that reputational harm damages can be awarded in a privacy claim even if the allegations are true (see Mann J’s decisions in Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) and Hannon v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2014] EWHC 1580 (Ch)). [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 7:24 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
& Kelebogile Zvobgo, Historical Violence and Public Attitudes towards Justice: Evidence from the United States Linda J Mann, Advancing Local US Transitional Justice Initiatives: A University Partnership Alongside Descendant Communities Notes from the Field Bretton J McEvoy, ‘Taking Responsibility for the White Collective’: Implicated Subjects and Transformative Justice in the United States Nina Bries Silva, Discovering What Is Already Known: The Afro-Colombian… [read post]
16 May 2024, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Todd (Liberty; Google Scholar) & Philip Manns (Liberty), Seeing Through the Sleight of Hand: Estate Tax Consequences of Redeeming Stock With Life Insurance Proceeds, 183 Tax Notes Fed. 437 (Apr. 15, 2024): The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Connelly v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:57 pm by Samuel Bray
Read more in this piece at ScotusBlog by Ronald Mann. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann… [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Sir Anthony Mann heard this case on appeal from the patent office, who originally refused to grant the patent. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am by Alessandro Cerri
These facts were borne from evidence which the High Court was entitled to accept; andOn due cause, the Court found (with some difficulty) that there was no error of law or principle in the High Court judge applying Julius Sämann Ltd v Tetrosyl Ltd [2006] EWHC 529 (Ch), in which Kitchin J had observed that the test for showing due cause is "relatively stringent" - in other words it is not enough to show that a sign has been innocently adopted, there must be something… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An accountant who has been retained to perform a “review engagement” is responsible for duties more limited in scope than an accountant hired to conduct an audit (William Iselin & Co. v Mann Judd Landau, 71 NY2d 420, 424-425 [1988]). [read post]