Search for: "Mann v. Mann" Results 141 - 160 of 1,291
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Attorneys may select among reasonable courses of action in prosecuting their clients’ cases without thereby committing malpractice … so that a purported malpractice claim that amounts only to a client’s criticism of counsel’s strategy may be dismissed” (Dweck Law Firm, LLP v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [2001 ]). [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am by Richard Hunt
Tester Standing As a follow up to my May 23, 2021 blog on this issue(9), other lower courts have adopted the Fifth Circuit’s approach to “informational injury” either before or after the Mann Hosp. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Attorneys may select among reasonable courses of action in prosecuting their clients’ cases without thereby committing malpractice … so that a purported malpractice claim that amounts only to a client’s criticism of counsel’s strategy may be dismissed” (Dweck Law Firm, LLP v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [2001 ]). [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On 30 March 2021,  Mann J handed down what is likely to be his final “phone hacking” judgment in ruling in Various Claimants v MGN [2021] EWHC 771 (Ch) regarding amendments to some of the Claimants’ statements of case and costs. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday and Friday 4 and 5 March 2021, Mann J conducted his final case management conference in the News Group phone hacking  litigation. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On 25 and 26 February 2021 Mann J heard a case management conference in the Mirror phone hacking litigation, Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 9:52 am by Dennis Crouch
In re Mann, 47 F.2d 370 (C.C.P.A. 1931) (applying double patenting to applications of different inventors) McCreary v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 1:16 am
A Person using a Juul DeviceAuthor Sarah Johnson Licence CC BY 2,0 Source Wikipedia Juul Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Mann) Juul Labs, Inc and others v MFP Enterprises Ltd (t/a 'Smoke Nation' and others) [2020] EWHC 3380 (Pat) (10 Dec 2020)This was an application for summary as well as default judgment against defendants that had not acknowledged service of the claim form or particulars [read post]
The expert committee shall comprise Bhupinder Singh Mann (the National President of Bhartiya Kisan Union and All India Kisan Coordination Committee), Dr. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court correctly determined that the complaint is devoid of allegations from which it could be inferred that any negligence by defendants in their handling of the family court proceeding was the “but for” causation of any damages (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Nedim Malovic
The first and third questionsIn terms of assessing ‘genuine use’, the CJEU first noted that, according to Ansul BV v Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (C–40/01), the fact that a mark is not used for goods newly available on the market but rather for goods that were sold in the past does not mean that its use is not genuine. [read post]