Search for: "Manson v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Justice Manson granted summary trial on issues of trademark infringement, likelihood of confusion, passing off and depreciation of goodwill in favour of the plaintiffs. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 6:00 am by Barry Sookman
The trial judge in that case had referred to the decision of Manson J stating ““Initial interest confusion” is a term of art in U.S. trademarks law which has not been incorporated into Canadian law: Red Label Vacations Inc. [read post]
17 May 2015, 2:57 am by Matthias Weller
Siehr recalled the landmark cases of Attorney-General of New Zealand v Ortiz, [1984] AC 1, Winkworth v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ben
 Judges Nathan and Netburn also disagreed with Escape's argument that pre-1972 sound recordings should be excluded, with Judge Nathan citing the recent decision in Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 2:16 pm by Kevin
The last window of opportunity for such an event would have been last weekend, because Corcoran State Prison only conducts inmate weddings on weekends, and the marriage license issued to Charles Manson and Elaine "Star" Burton expires this coming Thursday. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 1:23 pm by Stewart Baker
  Prudently, he refuses to be drawn into my comparison of Islamists to the Manson Family. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
  Prudently, he refuses to be drawn into my comparison of Islamists to the Manson Family. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
 The Court, explicitly recognizing the relationship between suggestiveness and mistakes in identification has repeatedly expressed concern that police arranged identification procedures may alter a witness’s memory rendering the subsequent identification testimony unreliable (United States v Wade, 388 US 218 [1967], Stovall v Denno, 388 US 293 [1967]; Simmons v United States, 390 US 377 [1968]; Manson v Braithwaite, 432 US 98… [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 3:00 am by Brent Lorentz
”  Kendall-Jackson v. [read post]