Search for: "Manufacturing Company v. Cowing" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Cattle brands distinguish one cow from another, so there’s no question which cow belongs to which rancher, even if they get mixed together. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:39 am by Jane Bambauer
But if the company acknowledges through speech that the drug has been successfully used for an off-label treatment of some sort, then the manufacturer faces heavy fines and criminal liability. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:23 am
  The registered registry of the company or close corporation is regarded as the place of “residence” of the company or close corporation for the purpose of section 61(3)(b) of the Act. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:23 am
  The registered registry of the company or close corporation is regarded as the place of “residence” of the company or close corporation for the purpose of section 61(3)(b) of the Act. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
The company’s Wallingford plant contained a production line that used to manufacture resins. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
Same manufacturers/partners are innovator/originator of biologic and also of biosimilar. (3) Rebates. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC again affirms invalidation of claims to 'means'-defined elements involving a computer algorithm as indefinite: Net MoneyIN v Verisign (IP Updates) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (PLI) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) District Court: Patent term adjustments just got longer: Wyeth v Dudas (Patent Docs)… [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
– EPA News Release, May 6, 2010 A metal engraving and electroplating company in North Kansas City, Mo., has agreed to pay a $31,612 civil penalty to settle allegations that it failed to file annual reports with EPA and the State of Missouri disclosing the types of toxic chemicals that were manufactured, processed or otherwise used at its facility. [read post]