Search for: "Mao v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2020, 1:58 pm
Contents include:ArticlesMiguel Lemos, Jus Cogens Versus the Chapter VII Powers of the Security Council: With Particular References to Humanitarian Intervention and Terrorism Carlo Focarelli, International Human Rights “in Crisis” and the Neoliberalization of the Human Person William S Dodge, Jurisdiction, State Immunity, and Judgments in the Restatement (Fourth) of US Foreign Relations Law Deming Huang & Qintong Shan, The Immunity of Judge Akay of the MICT … [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:10 pm
Contents include:ArticlesTilmann Altwicker, International Legal Scholarship and the Challenge of Digitalization Peter Hilpold, How to Construe a Myth: Neutrality Within the United Nations System Under Special Consideration of the Austrian Case Xuexia Liao, The Timor Sea Conciliation under Article 298 and Annex V of UNCLOS: A Critique Balingene Kahombo, The Western Sahara Cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union and International Law CommentsDaley J Birkett, Twenty… [read post]
These changes include: Amending 42 C.F.R. 422.112(a)(8) to require MAOs to ensure that services are provided in a culturally competent manner and to promote equitable access to all enrollees, including: (i) people with limited English proficiency or reading skills; (ii) people of ethnic, cultural, racial, or religious minorities; (iii) people with disabilities; (iv) people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or other diverse sexual orientations; (v) people who identify as… [read post]
9 May 2013, 3:31 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Recognized in Who’s Who In American Professionals and both an American Bar Association (ABA) and a State Bar of Texas Fellow, Ms. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:44 pm
Sara Dezalay & Simon Archer, By-passing sovereignty: Trafigura lawsuits (re Côte d’Ivoire) Song Mao, Alex Mills, Hisashi Harata & Oona Le Meur, Indigenous norms and judicial anthropology Franck Latty, Non-state authority: FIFA Ralf Michaels & Ludovic Hennebel, Informal Codes: Nike v Kasky François-Xavier Licari, Sandrine Brachotte & Nathalie Najjar, Arbitration and religion: Jivraj v Hashwani Darren Rosenblum, Calixto… [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:45 pm by Jason E. Christ
CMS reasoned that while the Social Security Act (the Act) requires actuarial equivalence between FFS and MA, the Act only applies to how CMS calculates the risk adjustment made to MAO payments and not to the obligation of MAOs to return improper payments, leveraging recent case law (UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
  This case marks a departure from federal district court decisions[1] which have denied MAOs (and Medicare-substitute health maintenance organizations) a federal independent right to sue primary payers, and in some cases, indicated that MAOs should seek potential remedies in state court based on a contractual claim and/or conflict preemption principles. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
  This case marks a departure from federal district court decisions[1] which have denied MAOs (and Medicare-substitute health maintenance organizations) a federal independent right to sue primary payers, and in some cases, indicated that MAOs should seek potential remedies in state court based on a contractual claim and/or conflict preemption principles. [read post]