Search for: "Mapp v. Ohio"
Results 41 - 60
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 4:45 am
The exclusionary rule articulated in Mapp v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:45 am
But despite its critics, it has also been a seemingly unimpeachable pillar of constitutional criminal procedure since the Supreme Court held in Mapp v Ohio (1961) that the remedy applied to states (via the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments) as much as to the federal government. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:25 pm
Davies, An Account of Mapp v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Mapp v. [read post]
OH11: Judicial intergrity justifies exclusion; warrantless entry for noise complaint was unjustified
10 Aug 2008, 3:30 pm
" But as Justice Clark so eloquently explained in the landmark decision in Mapp v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:07 am
In Mapp v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:20 am
Ohio (1961), that the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
Aaron, Mapp v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:18 pm
But he also said that the Court should reconsider whether the exclusionary rule applies to the States (a rule that has been in existence since 1961, when the Court decided Mapp v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:32 am
As a result, as ACS says, we better celebrate Mapp v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:16 am
Ohio? [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:33 pm
For example, one study trying to determine the impact of Mapp v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
Ohio? [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:05 am
Thus far, two podcasts are up, one on Mapp v Ohio (1961), and another on Texas v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:54 am
Ohio (1961) and Texas v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:07 am
United States and Mapp v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:13 pm
Relying on Mapp v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
Sundby has published a paper, entitled "Mapp v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:26 pm
Ohio, Gideon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:30 am
Melanie Wilson, University of Kansas School of Law discusses the 1961 case, Mapp v. [read post]
