Search for: "Mapp v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 7:33 am
It wasn't until 1961, in Mapp v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:04 am
State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:07 am
United States and Mapp v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 am
United States, and Terry v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 9:04 pm
If Mapp is authority, that was with a search warrant, so the rule is different. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
"Local" and "particular" values, i.e., American values, cannot be given too large a role.But what about trial by jury, the self-incrimination privilege, the Miranda rule, and, most of all, the exclusionary rule of Mapp v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 12:21 pm
Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 466 (1966); Mapp v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:13 pm
In 1961, moreover, half of the states permitted what Mapp forbade, including such notorious backwaters as New York. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:19 pm
Sundby, Mapp v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm
(He was not a fan of the blanket policy, at least not in that case, but in Mapp v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm
Arizona and Mapp v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
United States, — U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
One study back in the 60’s showed that in the years after Mapp v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:18 pm
Dawkins v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:54 am
See State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:59 am
State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:29 pm
Previous Supreme Court rulings, including Mapp v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:31 am
Wade, Mapp v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:23 am
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:45 am
But despite its critics, it has also been a seemingly unimpeachable pillar of constitutional criminal procedure since the Supreme Court held in Mapp v Ohio (1961) that the remedy applied to states (via the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments) as much as to the federal government. [read post]
