Search for: "Mapp v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2012, 5:38 am by Susan Brenner
In October, 2009, DiFilippo was assigned to the Rhode Island State Police High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) task force when he became involved in an investigation of a Nigerian heroin smuggling organization. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Court extended that Amendment, and with it, the exclusionary rule, to state and local governments in the 1961 case of Mapp v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:54 am
Feb 06, 2007) (NO. 9941, 9941A, 730/05)The People appeal from orders of the Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), entered (1) on or about August 4, 2005, which, after a Mapp hearing, granted defendant's motion for suppression, and (2) on or about September 9, 2005, which ...  12. -- A The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 7454/02 v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:57 am
Ultimately, if you are searched in a legal manner or during their investigation you state that you have a gun, the case addressed here may not help your cause, but your attorney should still seek to challenge the police and preserve your rights through a Huntley or Mapp Hearing. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Arizona (1966) and lesser known but even more important cases like Mapp v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
(as he then was) stated in Collins v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am by Rory Little
United States (1998, in which Justice Breyer wrote for the majority) that first advanced the constitutional theory adopted by the Court in Apprendi v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:46 am by Rick
— Tucker says: I told him about Mapp vs. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:23 am
  How Cardozo ridiculed it, and how the Supremes may get their chance to play with Mapp v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 8:27 am
In fact, in his motion, Padilla relies heavily on United States v. [read post]