Search for: "Mapp v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2009, 3:23 am
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:45 am
But despite its critics, it has also been a seemingly unimpeachable pillar of constitutional criminal procedure since the Supreme Court held in Mapp v Ohio (1961) that the remedy applied to states (via the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments) as much as to the federal government. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:13 am
Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 (1972); Mapp v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 7:53 am
Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:16 am
United States as a big step towards repealing the exclusionary rule the Court crafted in 1961 in Mapp v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
He notes the probability that four votes already exist to overturn Mapp v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 11:47 pm
Immediately after the decision, Mapp v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 11:30 pm
To do so would be no more violative of precedent that the state court decision affirmed in Roper v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 10:33 pm
Smart folks are still trying to work out whether the Herring case decided last week by the US Supreme Court narrowing the exclusionary rule is a big deal or a little one, and several good blog posts by attorneys have helped me think about the issue more concretely.Kent Scheidegger even thinks "Herring may be setting the stage for the Holy Grail -- overruling Mapp v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:06 pm
But the four dissenters appear to revive the other rationale for the rule, stated in Mapp but fallen from favor: that exclusion preserves the integrity of the judiciary by avoiding complicity in the constitutional violation. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 8:12 pm
" In United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:04 am
" This amendment, part of the Bill of Rights, made applicable to the individual states through the 14th amendment Due Process clause as established by the Supreme Court in Mapp v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 7:32 pm
Before the Supreme Court's 1961 ruling (in Mapp v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:36 am
Nelson Waiting for the Other Shoe: Hudson and the Precarious State of Mapp David A. [read post]
OH11: Judicial intergrity justifies exclusion; warrantless entry for noise complaint was unjustified
10 Aug 2008, 3:30 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 3:15 pm
As Justice Clark explained in Mapp v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:23 am
How Cardozo ridiculed it, and how the Supremes may get their chance to play with Mapp v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:39 pm
In a case known as Mapp v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
Walker (1965) that “the exclusionary rule announced in Mapp (v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
In Darden v. [read post]
