Search for: "Marc Randazza" Results 1 - 20 of 525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2025, 3:42 am by SHG
As my old buddy, Marc Randazza, says, murum ares attigit, the ram has hit the wall. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
But, as I noted later on Oct. 28, the court vacated that Mar. 13 order (in response to Marc Randazza's motion on my behalf), at least as applied to anyone other than Daoud, the defendant in that case. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 12:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
From today's Order Vacating in Part and Clarifying Order of Mar. 13, 2024 (responding to a motion filed Friday on my behalf by Marc Randazza and Kylie Werk of the Randazza Legal Group, PLLC): ORDER VACATING IN PART AND CLARIFYING ORDER OF MARCH 13, 2024 This action came before the Court on NON-PARTY EUGENE VOLOKH'S MOTION [D.E. 48] TO INTERVENE AND FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 3:27 am by Ron Coleman
”  John Welch and Marc Randazza address the issue brilliantly here and here. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 2:50 pm by Ron Coleman
The increasingly ubiquitous Marc Randazza pronounces, on the INTA list: In doing some research on the new Attorney General nominee, I discovered that he was the judge who penned the... [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
[The press pass is for election-related events connected to Maricopa County's ongoing ballot counting; the panel concluded that The Gateway Pundit was likely to succeed on its claim that the denial was unconstitutionally based on its viewpoints.] [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 6:05 am by Eugene Volokh
I express no opinion on the merits, but the passage seemed to be worth passing along; its authors are noted lawyers Marc Randazza, David Gingras, and John Burns. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:24 pm by Ron Coleman
Only Marc Randazza can put certain things in certain ways — and on those occasions when he’s actually right (like when he’s discussing law and not politics! [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
["[I]t is hard to shake the sense that the School Board is restricting the speech because the Board disagrees with both Mr. [read post]