Search for: "Mark Graber" Results 1 - 20 of 417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
ICYMI: Mark Graber on  Donald Trump and the Jefferson Davis Problem (NYT).Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Mark Graber and I joined Akhil and Andy Lipka to talk about Section Three. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 6:52 pm by Ilya Somin
Scholars such as Mark Graber have provided extensive evidence that they did (see here and here). [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:01 pm by Rick Hasen
Foley, Mark Graber, Rebecca Green, Gretchen Helmke, Sherrilyn Ifill, Sam Issacharoff, Kurt Lash, Lisa Manheim, Derek Muller, and Daniel… Continue reading The post Watch Archived Video of Safeguarding Democracy Project Conference: “The Law and Politics of Potentially Disqualifying Donald Trump from Running for President” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
”  Presenters include Josh Blackman, Mark Graber, Kurt Lash, and Eric Segall, q.v. this. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:00 am by Eric Segall
"Enter Professor Mark Graber who wrote his own long article on the history of Section 3 siding mostly with Baude and Paulsen. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  The conference will begin at 9:30 a.m., and the keynote address will be given by Mark Graber. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 3:53 pm by Josh Blackman
Lash's article responds to recent publications by Will Baude and Mike Paulsen, Mark Graber, Gerard Magliocca, and others. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Mark Graber, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, has posted Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment: Our Questions, Their Answers:The Congressional Globe, case survey, and constitutional commentaries clearly support the following conclusions. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 2:47 pm by Ilya Somin
As Steve Calabresi admits, and Mark Graber shows in detail (here and here), the congressional drafters of the 14th Amendment routinely spoke of the presidency as an officer of or "under" the United States and gave no indication it was somehow exempt. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 11:44 pm by Joseph Fishkin
A number of thoughtful scholars including Mark Graber and Gerard Magliocca on this very blog have made the case along with Baude and Paulson that in order to give force to 14.3, state and local decision-makers with the authority to decide who goes on the ballot should exclude Trump from the ballot. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 7:15 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
(Mark Graber, Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman, and myself). [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 10:00 am by JB
We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Yasmin Dawood (Toronto), Joey Fishkin (UCLA), Paul Gowder (Northwestern), Mark Graber (Maryland), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Julie Suk (Fordham), and myself.At the conclusion, Martin will respond to the commentators. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (5) These protests were a subset of “instructing and requesting” resolutions of state legislatures and form part of America’s vibrant “constitutional politics,” to use Mark Graber’s phrase. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  The vision expressed is not at all filing lawsuits in federal courts, but instead a far more active “interposition” by state legislatures, deemed to be thoroughly “representative” of their constituents, that attempt, in Fritz’s key metaphor, to “sound the alarm” about threats to the American constitutional order posed by national overreach.I agree strongly with Mark Graber’s emphasis that we should look at the Constitution as… [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by JB
We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Jessica Bulman-Pozen (Columbia), Mark Graber (Maryland), Alison LaCroix (Chicago), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Grace Mallon (Oxford), Edward Purcell (New York Law School), and David Schwartz (Wisconsin).At the conclusion, Chris will respond to the commentators. [read post]