Search for: "Mark Graber"
Results 21 - 40
of 444
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2024, 7:38 am
Mark Graber A long exhaustive search has finally found an article published within ten years of the framing of the Fourteenth Amendment that declares that the President is not an officer of the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
A common refrain from Professor Mark Graber and others is that we have pointed to no one who publicly stated that view "within a decade" of the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 3:19 pm
As legal scholar Mark Graber shows, contemporary definitions of "insurrection" prevalent at the time the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted were quite broad: possibly broad enough to encompass any violent resistance to the enforcement of a federal statute, when that resistance was motivated by a "public purpose. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Eisen, Roadmap to Accountability: How the Jan. 6 Committee Can Help Enforce the 14th Amendment, Just Security (Nov. 15, 2022) Ryan Goodman, Civil Society Orgs’ Letter to Schumer: Disqualify Trump via 14th Amendment, Just Security (Feb. 18, 2021) Mark A. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
The latest on Section 3 and the Presidency: Kurt Lash in the NYT and Mark Graber's reply in Balkinization. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
No other legal historian has made as extensive a study of Section 3 as Professor Mark Graber, who recently noted that “many participants in framing, ratifying and implementation debates over constitutional disqualification . . . explicitly” made the point that Section 3 covered the presidency.Another objection we might hear from Trump or his allies is that Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not apply outside the context of the Civil War. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 7:42 am
One of them was with Mark Graber and myself. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: Mark Graber on Donald Trump and the Jefferson Davis Problem (NYT).Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Mark Graber and I joined Akhil and Andy Lipka to talk about Section Three. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 6:52 pm
Scholars such as Mark Graber have provided extensive evidence that they did (see here and here). [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:01 pm
Foley, Mark Graber, Rebecca Green, Gretchen Helmke, Sherrilyn Ifill, Sam Issacharoff, Kurt Lash, Lisa Manheim, Derek Muller, and Daniel… Continue reading The post Watch Archived Video of Safeguarding Democracy Project Conference: “The Law and Politics of Potentially Disqualifying Donald Trump from Running for President” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 2:15 pm
[Mark Graber and I discuss whether Trump is disqualified.] [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
” Presenters include Josh Blackman, Mark Graber, Kurt Lash, and Eric Segall, q.v. this. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
"Enter Professor Mark Graber who wrote his own long article on the history of Section 3 siding mostly with Baude and Paulsen. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
The conference will begin at 9:30 a.m., and the keynote address will be given by Mark Graber. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 3:53 pm
Lash's article responds to recent publications by Will Baude and Mike Paulsen, Mark Graber, Gerard Magliocca, and others. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Mark Graber, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, has posted Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment: Our Questions, Their Answers:The Congressional Globe, case survey, and constitutional commentaries clearly support the following conclusions. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 3:09 pm
Mark Graber has posted this draft on SSRN. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 2:47 pm
As Steve Calabresi admits, and Mark Graber shows in detail (here and here), the congressional drafters of the 14th Amendment routinely spoke of the presidency as an officer of or "under" the United States and gave no indication it was somehow exempt. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 11:44 pm
A number of thoughtful scholars including Mark Graber and Gerard Magliocca on this very blog have made the case along with Baude and Paulson that in order to give force to 14.3, state and local decision-makers with the authority to decide who goes on the ballot should exclude Trump from the ballot. [read post]
