Search for: "Mark Graber"
Results 121 - 140
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Kate Masur, Until Justice Be Done: America's First Civil Rights Movement, From the Revolution to Reconstruction (W. [read post]
28 May 2021, 9:30 pm
Union attorney Mark A. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:00 am
Norton & Company, 2021).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Laura Edwards (Princeton), Mark Graber (Maryland), Michael Les Bendict (Ohio State), Sanford Levinson (Texas), Gerard Magliocca (Indiana), William Novack (Michigan), Kunal Parker (Miami), and Allison Tirres (DePaul).At the conclusion, Kate will respond to the commentators. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber on Their Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3 and Ours, from his book in progress, The Forgotten Fourteenth Amendment (Just Security). [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Mark Graber, Constitutional Trench Warfare over Abortion6. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
” Mark Graber sees my focus on policy-based claims as a reflection of the “constitutional trench warfare [that] has structured debate over abortion rights. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 9:30 pm
Wade to the Present (2020), including Mark Graber’s contribution, Constitutional Trench Warfare over Abortion. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In recent days, several scholars and lawmakers have suggested that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment might be used to bar Donald Trump and some of his allies from ever holding federal or state office again. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:19 pm
Mark Graber explained this well in his post. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber on the second impeachment (WBALTV). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:33 pm
But it is a mistake to think the Supreme Court is the venue in which such issues are always resolved.As I was about to post this, I saw that a few minutes ago, Mark Graber posted a link to a characteristically thoughtful piece making exactly this point, and centering in particular the Reconstruction Republicans’ idea that it’s Congress who decides who has engaged in “insurrection”—and that Congress could take action now to make it clear that President… [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
(Full disclosure: I was happy to write an enthusiastic Foreword to the book, and Balkinization regular Mark Graber also contributed a strong blurb, as did University of Virginia history professor emeritus Peter Onuf.In some ways, the book can be compared to the Declaration of Independence. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
Mark Graber made a similar point two decades ago. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Ned Foley (Ohio State), Mark Graber (Maryland), Jack Rakove (Stanford), James Stoner (LSU), Franita Tolson (USC), Sanford Levinson (Texas), and Donald Verrilli (Munger, Tolles, & Olson).At the conclusion, Alex and Jesse will respond to the commentators. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:30 pm
The Trump Presidency in Comparative and Historical Perspective," with Mark Graber, Kim Lane Scheppele, David Pozen, Miguel Schor and Ralf Michaels) and these two plenary panels on Thursday:"What is the Relationship between Comparative Law and Legal History? [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:58 pm
“The Celebrated, if Not Notorious RBG”: Mark Graber has this post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Khiara Bridges (Berkeley), Jed Britton-Purdy (Columbia), Mark Graber (Maryland), David Grewal (Berkeley), Stephen Griffin (Tulane), Randy Kennedy (Harvard), Sanford Levinson (Texas), Stephen Skowronek (Yale), Julie Suk (CUNY), Sam Wang (Princeton), and Mariah Zeisberg (Michigan). [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am
Only Mark Tushnet appeared. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
For instance, in light of Mark Graber’s pathbreaking study of Dred Scott (a work too many constitutional scholars have apparently not yet read), a good example is simply accepting the Republican critique of that infamous decision as if there were no case to be made against African American citizenship prior to the adoption of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. [read post]
