Search for: "Mark Graber" Results 141 - 160 of 310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2009, 2:48 am
Empathy, so understood, is a basic and necessary tool for making sense of the intentions and actions of others.So, as Mark Graber asks, who could be against empathy? [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
In other words, only from the perspective of a new kind of fixity born in the 1790s did the enduring contest that treats originalism and living constitutionalism as warring alternatives become intelligible.With this account of fixity in mind, I would modify Mark Graber’s suggestive framework for comprehending when constitutional actors appeal to fixity. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:37 am by Alfred Brophy
This may in some ways confirm what Mark Graber (cribbing from Hannah Arendt, obviously) refers to as the banality of constitutional evil.   [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
”—Mark Graber, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law “The book’s clear, forcibly argued, and original thesis challenges some of the most influential scholarship in its field. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 11:33 am by Stephen Griffin
I've posted an article from Mark Graber's Maryland Law School Symposium on SSRN: "Trump, Trust and the Future of the Constitutional Order. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Congratulations to Anne Fleming, Georgetown Law, upon her election to the Board of Trustees of the Business History Conference.Keith Whittington’s Workshop in Constitutional Development at Princeton had quite a double bill last Monday: "The Jacksonian Makings of the Taney Court," by Mark Graber, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law; and "Building the Administrative State: Courts and the Admission of Chinese Persons to the United States,… [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 12:30 am by Dan Ernst
LHB readers who study or work in law school settings may be interested in Mark Graber's recent Balknization post on "Rethinking of the Rethinking of Legal Education." [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
" —Mark Graber"Wayne Batchis is a lawyer-political scientist who impressively deploys both disciplines' approaches to improve our understanding of conservative politics and constitutional principles. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Over at Balkinization, Mark Graber wonders whether law schools made a "mistake" a century ago, when they "made a self-conscious decision to be a part of the universities." [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:10 am
Mark K. opined that none of the issues we were discussing would be able to solve that problem. [read post]
22 May 2016, 10:32 pm by Sandy Levinson
 As Mark Graber notes in his own excellent post, Sen. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
Mark Tushnet, Mark Graber, and Sanford Levinson. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 8:37 am by Lawrence Solum
McClain, "Liberty," Oxford Handbook of the United States Constitution (Mark Tushnet, Mark Graber, and Sanford Levinson, editors, Oxford University Press), Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:05 am
Steven TelesI read with interest Mark Graber's generally appreciative assessment of Rosenberg's Hollow Hope. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:24 am by Ken Kersch
In his post reflecting on Judge Wilkinson’s argument against “cosmic constitutional theory,” Mark Graber insists that, Wilkinson’s protestations notwithstanding, the Judge himself -- inevitably -- can’t help but advance his own brand of constitutional theory. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:31 am by Mark Graber
When I speak, I speak as Professor Mark A. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Lawrence Solum
Graber [PDF] Constitutional Faith, Constitutional Redemption, and Political Science: Can Faith and Political Science Coexist? [read post]
2 May 2007, 7:03 pm
At Balkinization, Jack Balkin has this post on President Reagan's comments in his personal diary from the day he nominated Justice O'Connor, which refers to this article by Howard Kurtz in the Washington Post; Lee Epstein writes here about gender difference and the Supreme Court's 8-person male majority; and Mark Graber has this post about the "intimidating environment" created by the Court's abortion ruling for physicians. [read post]