Search for: "Mark J. Levin" Results 141 - 160 of 220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
John, Harvard University Cybelle Fox, University of California, Berkeley  Commentator: William J. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm by Larry Catá Backer
  The financial institutional activity includes: admissions of price fixing (Barclays) (see Peter J. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Brach v Levine    2012 NY Slip Op 51312(U)   Decided on July 16, 2012   Supreme Court, Kings County   Battaglia, J. is an example. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:31 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Court of Appeals Ruling May Broaden Bank Liability for Unauthorized Internet Funds Transfers – Andrew J. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
., a foreign corporation, Appellees. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Dismissal -- Standing -- Trial court correctly concluded that dissolved limited liability company which had assigned its claims against defendant to members of LLC lacked standingVERO BEACH REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, L.L.C. and ERIC LEVINE, Appellants, v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 10:54 pm
Mikels, Partner Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo (Boston) Tom Salerno, Partner, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey (Phoenix) William Henrich, Vice Chairman, Getzler Henrich (NY) J. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am by Joshua Matz
  Larry Levine of the National Resource Defense Counsel Switchboard Blog argues that, “if the court rules in favor of the Sacketts and these industry giants, the agency will have a much harder time stopping environmental harm. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
  See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
  See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]