Search for: "Mark J. Neuberger" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
Arnold J, though he did mention the horns, did not appear to give sufficient weight to the overall impression of a horned animal. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:17 am
 Judge Vadja highlighted that it is a good thing for any judicial system to represent people from different backgrounds and with different perspectives.Carr noted that many of the best trade mark judgments come from non specialists such as Neuberger LJ. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:58 am by Oliver Gayner & Rebecca Platt, Olswang
VTB contended that, in reaching this view, Arnold J had failed to acknowledge that there was a presumption that the place where a tort is committed is the natural or appropriate forum.  [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
 According to Lord Neuberger in Best Buy at para 18, this is an objective test. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am by Riana Harvey
Trade mark disputes with accompanying passing off claims are nothing new. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:32 am
| Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation | Lord Neuberger's most difficult case | US Senate passes Trade Secrets Act Never too late 90 [week ending on Sunday 3 April] – Book review: "IP and Other Things" by Sir Robin Jacob| Book review:  "Trade Marks Law" by Glen Gibbons| IPKat Post #10,00 | Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others |Two Book Reviews: European Law Design and The… [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:55 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
The lead judgment was given by Lord Toulson, with Lord Reed giving a secondary judgment and Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Wilson agreeing with the findings of both. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
[25], but preferred the four factors identified by Lord Neuberger in WL Gore & Associates GmbH and Geox SPA [2008] EWHC Civ. 622 at para [25].  [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am by Blog  Editorial
On 1 February 2012 the Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the ruling of Mann J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on PSI ([2012] EWCA Civ 48).  [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
”  Alex Hern in the Guardian has annotated Mark Zuckerberg’s letter about the goals of Facebook. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
In light of the wording used by Lord Neuberger, PCCM was effectively trying to obtain a similar monopoly without registration, relying on its repute among UK residents. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am by Dave
 Perhaps, in that period, Hildyard J should have read one of Mark Wonnacott’s rather good, but decidedly specialist, landlord and tenant historical monographs. [read post]