Search for: "Mark Mermelstein" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2014, 12:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Ben Mermelstein, Volker Nocke, University of Mannheim, Mark Satterthwaite, and Michael Whinston, MIT offer Internal versus External Growth in Industries with Scale Economies: A Computational Model of Optimal Merger Policy. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Internal versus External Growth in Industries with Scale Economies: A Computational Model of Optimal Merger Policy By: Ben Mermelstein; Volker Nocke; Mark A. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:30 am by D Daniel Sokol
Ben Mermelstein, Northwestern University, Volker Nocke, University of Mannheim, Mark Satterthwaite, Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management, and Michael D. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:27 am
" Purchasers would more likely consider the mark to refer simply to goods available to the public.Judge Mermelstein disagreed that PUBLIX has no recognized meaning. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:21 am
In re Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., Serial No. 87072333 (November 6, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David Mermelstein).During examination, the USPTO must analyze the specimens of use to determine whether the purported mark would be perceived as a source indicator. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 5:55 am
Misel Disel, LLC, Opposition No. 91225389 (November 5, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David Mermelstein). [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:54 am by John L. Welch
He maintained that Applicant's specimens are adequate to show use of the mark for microscopes.Judge Mermelstein noted that while Applicant's products goods are sometimes referred to as toys, the are also sometimes referred to as useful tools. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 3:46 am
In re Altoz, Inc., Serial No. 88625236 (August 17, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David Mermelstein). [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 3:45 am
 In re E Z Products, Inc., Serial No. 87906813 (October 21, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David Mermelstein). [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:03 am by Steve Sheinberg
 My co-panelists, Meg Strickler, Jon Neiditz and Mark Mermelstein, will have the chance to review this content, but until they do, I am solely responsible for its content. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 3:13 am
In re Naboso Technology, LLC, Serial No. 87236262 (February 27, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David Mermelstein).Strength of the BAREFOOT marks: As to commercial strength, applicant pointed to eleven registrations for marks comprising the terms BAREFOOT, BARE FOOT, or BARE FEET for a variety of goods and services. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 3:44 am
[Answers in first comment].In re Michel Mercier, Serial No. 79246019 (November 24, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David Mermelstein). [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:24 am
The Board sustained an opposition to registration of the mark SCOTTSDALE TAXI for "taxi transport" services [TAXI disclaimed], finding the mark to be "highly geographically descriptive" and lacking in acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
"Weighing the relevant duPont, the panel majority (Judges Walsh and Mermelstein) ruled that confusion is likely and it sustained the opposition.In dissent, Judge Drost stated his view that, comparing the marks in their entireties, the dissimilarities in their sound, appearance, meaning, and commercial impression outweigh the similarities. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 3:15 am
It found that, considering the mark as a whole, DENIM refers to the fabric. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 1:18 pm by Trent
The next speaker was one of the judges for the hearing, David Mermelstein. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:17 am by John L. Welch
Mermelstein, David: Appointed to TTAB in 2006: Prior Professional Experience: TTAB Interlocutory Attorney; TTAB Supervisory Interlocutory Attorney; Trademark Examining Attorney. [read post]