Search for: "Mark Radcliffe"
Results 41 - 60
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm
Esteves, Mark F. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:35 am
Vaughn-Nichols’ recap of the top five Linux stories, and Mark Radcliffe’s take. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 2:27 pm
A bite mark was also found on the baby girl. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:10 am
– from Social Media Today Double Fisting and Crazy Bitch Bingo – from Phil Miles’s Lawffice Space HR & Employee Relations 5 reasons for employers to “hold their fire” on dismissal of employment suits – from Robin Shea’s Employment and Labor Insider Negligent Supervision & Hiring – from Rob Radcliff’s Smooth Transitions Gallup Data on Obese Workers: Time to Dust Off “Lighter” Workplace Tips –… [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:04 am
Saturday, September 24th marked the first day of Banned Books Week 2011. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:04 am
Saturday, September 24th marked the first day of Banned Books Week 2011. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:35 am
Two of my fellow bloggers weighed on the issue of religion in the workplace this week: Passover & Easter: A Time to Reflect on Religious Discrimination Issues – from Daniel Schwartz’s Connecticut Employment Law Blog Religion in the Workplace: 5 Devilish Employer Mistakes – from Employment and Labor Insider Here’s the rest of what I read this week: Social Media & Workplace Technology Social Networks: New Hotbed for Hiring Discrimination Claims –… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
Initial conception of dilution was targeted at coined/fanciful marks, giving copyright-like interests some play—you can’t copy that famous unique mark. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 5:58 am
Queen Elizabeth II to mark 50th year on throne. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 5:51 am
– from Rob Radcliff’s Smooth Transitions “Head-Start” Rule Applies to Damages, As Well As Injunctions – from Kenneth Vanko’s Legal Developments In Non-Competition Agreements Miscellaneous NLRB Seeks Briefs in Case Alleging Discriminatory Denial of Union Access to Employer Property – from Seth Borden’s Labor Relations Today Are You Working Over the Thanksgiving Holiday? [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:30 am
Next week’s WIRTW #151 marks another milestone—my 1000th post. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:52 am
This week marked the beginning of the Supreme Court’s October 2010 term, which has three important employment cases on its docket. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 4:52 pm
With 143 posts on the LexBlog Network today, we have some very solid entries for the roundup today: Rob Radcliff comments on Mark Hurd's settlement with HP, Scott Key highlights some lessons learned from a trial appearance and Bryan Esquenazi discusses sports injuries in children. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 7:33 am
Radcliffe Road looks like a game that the JV team is destined to lose, and badly. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 12:39 pm
A man should use exclamation marks only on the rarest occasions, especially in professional situations. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:46 pm
Blog on Cutting Edge Issues - Law firm consultant Cordell Parvin on his Law Consulting Blog No "Life Plus Cancer" In The Federal System - Texas lawyer Jamie Spencer in his Austin Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog Reassessing Affordable Housing - Literally - Arlington attorney Tad Lunger of Bean, Kinney & Korman on the firm's blog, Virginia Real Estate, Land Use & Construction Law Caught Red Handed with LinkedIn - Dallas non-compete lawyer Rob Radcliff on his… [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:26 am
Radcliffe, he said, was not on [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
Lester v Woodgate [2010] EWCA Civ 199 is a wonderful example of a neighbour dispute getting out of hand (so out of hand, in fact, that indemnity costs were awarded against the Claimant, in the Truro County Court, in "an exemplary use of the power to mark the court's disapproval of the use of litigation to intimidate", Sedley LJ at [53]). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
Lester v Woodgate [2010] EWCA Civ 199 is a wonderful example of a neighbour dispute getting out of hand (so out of hand, in fact, that indemnity costs were awarded against the Claimant, in the Truro County Court, in "an exemplary use of the power to mark the court's disapproval of the use of litigation to intimidate", Sedley LJ at [53]). [read post]
