Search for: "Mark S. Humphreys"
Results 61 - 80
of 389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2020, 5:56 am
Moreover, the OGH found the Higher Regional Court’s findings that (i) the class 21 products, in particular drinking glasses, had a sufficient connection so as to be associated with this geographical location as well, and (ii) that the figurative elements did not alter the dominance of the element “Sophienwald” in the figurative mark, to be in line with established case law. [read post]
20 May 2020, 6:18 am
Lord Justice Arnold has taken on board CJEU’s ruling that a trade mark cannot be invalidated on the ground of a lack of clarity and precision in its specification. [read post]
11 May 2020, 7:53 am
The district court did not err in determining that the evidence did not establish that the San Diego Comic Convention marks were generic. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:52 am
During the Paris trial, AR’s trademark was revoked for non-use. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:31 am
Yesterday's post was from Keith Humphreys (Stanford Med School) reflecting, as I have in the past, on the decline in law-and-policy blogs in the face of the decline of paid journalism and the rise of social media and the gravitation of many bloggers and readers to Twitter and other... [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:59 am
Red Bull’s marks and the disputed Big Horn signs are as follows: Red Bull’s marks and the disputed Big Horn signsRed Bull claimed infringement of their trade marks contrary to Article 9(2)(b) and 9(2)(c). [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Criminal Proceedings and Public Personae"A special attraction of the online exhibit is a digital reproduction of the Humphrey Shop Album, created by prominent London satiric print publisher George Humphrey (1773? [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:12 am
Interestingly enough, the argument that ” refusal of registration only means that the sign is not granted protection under trade mark law and does not prevent the use of the sign – even in commercial matters” echoes arguments which were made to justify the USPTO’s refusal to “THE SLANTS”. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 12:00 am
However, it’s a change of script for a story that could have been a great success. [read post]
Argument preview: Determining the statute of limitations for military rape — and possibly a lot more
16 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
In July 1998, Humphrey Daniels was stationed at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:31 am
” The Metropolitan Court of Budapest ruled in 2015 that a tanning tube manufacturer had committed trademark infringement as contract manufacturer, having affixed signs on solarium tubes upon a customer’s orders infringing the plaintiff’s trademark. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:49 am
Thus, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s order refusing registration of both proposed marks was affirmed (In re JC Hospitality LLC, February 28, 2020, Prost, S.). [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 7:53 am
Here's a photograph — from the front page at the NYT website — by Mark Humphrey/Associated Press. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:42 am
• Mark A. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 7:35 am
What’s Next? [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 5:07 am
In our earlier comment (see here), we had voiced some doubts about the GC’s conclusion. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 7:40 am
It is yet to be seen whether this decision has an impact on Julius Sämann’s enforcement strategy to contest later marks in class 3 that consist of or contain tree devices. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
Ann Arbor, 675 F.3d 608, 611 (6th Cir. 2012) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:00 am
If the court affirms the CFPB’s novel combination of single-leader structure, for-cause removal protection and immense substantive policymaking power, then its affirmance will mark the final repudiation of Humphrey’s Executor. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:37 am
In affirming the federal district court’s dismissal of Neutron Depot’s suit alleging infringement of the INSURANCE DEPOT mark against Bankrate, the Fifth Circuit concluded that Neutron Depot did not own the mark outright at any point when the infringement took place (Neutron Depot, LLC v. [read post]
