Search for: "Mark S. Humphreys" Results 81 - 100 of 381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2012, 11:22 am by Jenna Greene
On the broadcasters’ side, the ABC Television Affiliates retained Wade Hampton Hargrove, Jr. and Mark Jay Park of Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 2:01 am by Robert Margolis
Robert MargolisDistrict court correctly held that trademark owner failed to raise genuine factual issue as to secondary meaning of the asserted mark. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 3:54 am by Louise Thorning Ahle
In general, a trademark is considered to have acquired distinctive character when the mark applied for is known by the relevant public as a sign of origin/business identifier for the applicant’s goods/services within the relevant territory. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:32 am by Jody Coultas
The Eleventh Circuit agreed with that conclusion based on the plain language of the licensing agreement and affirmed the lower court’s decision (Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am by Cheryl Beise
The Board’s decision to sustain Frito Lay’s opposition to registration of the marks on the ground of mere descriptiveness was affirmed. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:19 am
Attorney Mark Humphreys gives limited information, but still provides his phone number and Web site for easy contact. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:07 am by Blair Albom
(“WSI”) willfully infringed ACT’s “777” trademark for nail brushes, the jury also reasonably found that ACT’s claims were time-barred because knew or should have known about WSI’s use of the 777 mark more than four years before filing suit, the U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 2:38 am by Julius Stobbs
In addition, Mitsubishi’s ability to realise the economic value of the goods bearing its mark was affected. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 12:37 am by Florica Rus
The AG’s thoughts about the risks of an abuse of the EU trade mark system by obtaining monopolies for a five-year period without any use are valid. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 3:13 am by Julius Stobbs
Gleissner’s conduct has been scrutinised in a plethora of trade mark and domain name decisions globally. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:41 am by Carolina Pina
It held that NATEXO’s use of the mark appeared to imply that the competition was organized by BIMBO, or at least sponsored by BIMBO. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:09 am
Gordon Humphreys gave a short account of how OHIM's Boards of Appeal follow their written procedure, involving the deliberation and drafting process, emphasizing that the linguistic challenges posed by the EU: 28 have to be factored in, when for example one of the marks is meaningful in a particular language. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 3:04 pm by Sascha Abrar
The court stressed that in most trade mark infringement matters, the balance of interest (urgency) will swing in the plaintiff’s favour, on condition that the infringement continues. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 9:57 pm by David Leffler
The PMD did, therefore, not consider the evidence to be conclusive that the mark had become established on the market in Sweden at the time of Green Staplers registration and, therefore, did not accept Volvo’s claim to rights in an unregistered trademark at the time of filing of Green Stapler’s mark. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:32 am by Florica Rus
It is indeed hard to construe how taking off somebody’s mark and then selling the goods under a different mark can be use of the mark for the goods in the marketplace. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 12:28 am by Carolina Pina
In other words, it will not be necessary to first cancel a trade mark registration that infringes upon third party rights in order to bring infringement proceedings against such trade mark. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm by Sandy Levinson
Both Mark Graber and Gerard Magliocca make important points. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:16 am by Amrit Singh
It found the marks to be similar and Nike’s mark to be inherently distinctive. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:53 am by Julius Stobbs
  Whether ESL had infringed SUL’s SULETS mark under section 10(2) of the TMA, i.e., was the mark used by ESL identical or similar to SUL’s SULETS mark and if so, whether ESL’s use in the course of trade of their mark in relation to student letting agency services resulted in a likelihood of confusion with SUL’s mark. [read post]