Search for: "Mark Seidenfeld" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2012, 1:42 pm by AdminLaw Blogger
"Substituting Substantive for Procedural Review of Guidance Documents" by Mark Seidenfeld (Florida State), 90 TEXAS L. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 7:28 am
Mark Seidenfeld (Florida State) has posted In Search of Robin Hood: Suggested Legislative Responses to Kelo on SSRN. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 11:35 pm
Mark Seidenfeld (Florida State University College of Law) has posted Agency Decisions to Regulate on SSRN. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:36 pm
Mark Seidenfeld (Florida State University College of Law) has posted Chevron's Foundation on SSRN. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:00 am
Galle (Florida State) & Mark Seidenfeld (Florida State) have published Admin Law's Federalism: Preemption, Delegation, and Agencies at the Edge of Federal Power, 57 Duke L.J. 1933 (2008). [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 3:30 am
This New York Times article reports on the troubles of American businessman Mark Seidenfeld, the telecommunications entreprenuer who made a fortune during the dizzying days of Kazahkstan's conversion from a communist to a market economy. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:26 pm
Abstract: This essay replies to contributions by Brian Galle and Mark Seidenfeld and by Gillian Metzger to the Duke... [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 11:25 pm
Volume 57 May 2008 Number 7 Articles Administrative Law's Federalism: Preemption, Delegation, and Agencies at the Edge of Federal Power Brian Galle, Mark Seidenfeld Administrative Law as the New Federalism Gillian E. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am by William Funk
J. 277 (2010).Mark Seidenfeld, Substituting Substantive for Procedural Reiew of Guidance Documents (FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 479, 2011), available at SSRN. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:30 am by Mark Seidenfeld
Mark Seidenfeld Administrative law scholars in the United States who seek to borrow ideas from approaches tried by other liberal democracies face a substantial problem: each country’s government is structured differently. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:30 am by Mark Seidenfeld
Mark Seidenfeld Those of us who write in administrative law often get stuck in the ruts created by the categories set out in the Administrative Procedures Act—especially rulemaking, adjudication and judicial review. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 10:32 am
  Here is the abstract:This essay replies to contributions by Brian Galle and Mark Seidenfeld and by Gillian Metzger to the Duke Law Journal's 2008 Administrative Law Symposium. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 2:46 pm
To get the ball rolling, Mark Seidenfeld at Florida State is the chair of FSU's (unified) appointments committee. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:43 am
To get the ball rolling, Mark Seidenfeld at Florida State is the chair of FSU's (unified) appointments committee. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:41 pm by Dan Markel
The 2012 committee includes Jeffrey Kahn (Chair), Mark Seidenfeld, Franita Tolson, Wayne Logan, and Shawn Bayern. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:05 pm
To get the ball rolling, Mark Seidenfeld at Florida State is the chair of FSU's (unified) appointments committee. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:30 am by Mark Seidenfeld
Mark Seidenfeld Ever since courts have recognized the legitimacy of political influence on agency policymaking, scholars have struggled to formulate a model of Administrative Law that describes an appropriate balance between such influence and agency expertise. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 3:30 am by Mark Seidenfeld
Mark Seidenfeld Over the past several decades, many scholars have weighed in on benefits and detriments of authorizing private parties to sue to enforce federal regulatory standards. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 3:28 pm
Galle and Mark Seidenfeld, of the Florida State University College of Law. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:15 pm
According to Mark Seidenfeld, a Florida State University administrative law expert, the document may be useful to influence a court regarding the intent of the law, but whether it would have an actual impact on a court’s decision following a challenge is not apparent. [read post]