Search for: "Mark Tushnet" Results 181 - 200 of 981
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2009, 1:39 pm
  Robert Bork is cited frequently, but not as frequently as Archibald Cox, and Mark Tushnet outpaces Laurence Tribe. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:30 am by Mary L. Dudziak
On Airtalk on NPR, Larry Mantle went so far as to ask Mark Tushnet: “On the personal side did you have any sense of whether she was in a relationship, or dated? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
Over time, after reading engaging comparative and/or cross-disciplinary work by scholars including Vicki Jackson, Mark Tushnet, George Billias, Andrew Lewis, Mary Dudziak, Willy Forbath and Ariela Gross, I've [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 8:09 am by admin
Por un lado, nos proponemos homenajear la reconocida trayectoria del profesor Mark Tushnet; y por el otro, queremos ayudar a difundir en Hispanoamérica su teoría constitucional, que representa uno de los pensamientos más abiertos y avanzados que hoy pueden encontrarse en el área. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:42 am
Rebecca Tushnet’s 43(B)log reports on a decision in a case called Trott’s Woodproducts, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:44 am by Sandy Levinson
 One of Mark Tushnet’s most famous descriptions was “the lawyer as astrophysicist,” referring [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:38 pm by pittlegalscholarship
Columbia Legal Theory Mark Tushnet (Harvard Law) presents “Civil Liberties After 1937 - The Justices and Their Theories. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:59 am
In Cass Sunstein's recent review of Mark Tushnet's book, "Out of Range:  Why the Constitution Can't End the Battle Over Guns", the former writes:Tushnet's punch line is that the real division is less legal than cultural: it involves not the founding era or the constitutional text, but the sharp and emphatically contemporary divide over the role and the meaning of firearms. . . . [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:50 pm by Ilya Somin
Mark Tushnet and political scientist Aaron Belkin urge President Biden to disobey "gravely mistaken" Supreme Court rulings. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:05 pm
Last Thursday, The Federalist Society hosted a debate about the Second Amendment with Professor Mark Tushnet, author of Out of Range: Why the Constitution Can't End the Battle Over Guns and Clark Neily, plaintiffs' counsel in Parker v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 11:38 am by Deven Desai
Yes, I am looking at sites I marked and wanted to share. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 9:12 am
I received an email from Porter Heath Morgan, whose documentary on the challenges of law school features both Randy Barnett and Georgetown emeritus professor Mark Tushnet. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 2:00 am by vhunt
UC Hastings College of the LawMark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, Harvard Law School, presents today. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 1:54 pm
Mark Tushnet has introduced the term "constitutional hardball" to academic discourse, by which he means a willingness of players within the system to push the envelope of their powers and see what happens. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:00 pm by Ezra Rosser
New Book Chapter: Mark Tushnet, The Inadequacy of Judicial Enforcement of Constitutional Rights Provisions to Rectify Economic Inequality, and the Inevitability of the Attempt, in Judicial Review: Process, Powers and Problems (Cambridge University Press 2020, eds. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 2:59 am
Mark Tushnet writes that prosecution for war crimes isn't the only alternative:Ah, Jack, you're not thinking outside the box. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 3:22 pm by Ilya Somin
[Leading constitutional law scholars Larry Solum and Mark Tushnet opine on how we might answer this question.] [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by propertyprof
The following is a guest post from Rebecca Tushnet of Georgetown. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 1:37 pm
But Samuel Clemens can't claim to be Mark Twain in my business dealings with him (if it matters to me that he is in fact Mark Twain). [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:03 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
The marks and the products on which the marks are used can be, but need not be, identical. [read post]