Search for: "Mark Tushnet"
Results 501 - 520
of 876
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
Lisa Ramsey, Reconciling Trademark Rights and Free Speech Locally and Globally Commentator: Rebecca Tushnet International element to the question of how to limit trademark to protect free speech. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:00 am
Mark Tushnet (Harvard), Legal Scholarship (1): In the Law Reviews: On the plane today I read a terrific article, Brannon Denning and Michael Kent, Anti-Evasion Doctrines in Constitutional Law, 2012 Utah Law Review 1773. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:53 am
On another scholarship-related note, Mark Tushnet has a lovely post up praising a recently published piece by Brannon Denning and Michael Kent on anti-evasion doctrines in constitutional law. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
• Harvard Law Professor Mark Tushnet specializes in constitutional law and theory, with a focus in examining the practice of judicial review in the U.S. and worldwide. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:32 pm
The City University of Hong Kong's Centre for Comparative and Chinese Law hosted an International Conference on “The Rule of Law With Chinese Characteristics in Transition” held 5-7 June 2013 at the Connie Fan Multi-Media Conference Room, 4/F Chen Yick-Chi Building on the campus of CUHK. [read post]
30 May 2013, 10:00 am
” Before the Tribe and Matz work hits the streets, on of Tribe’s colleagues, Mark Tushnet, will publish his own thoughts on the current Court. [read post]
12 May 2013, 9:30 pm
”—Mark Tushnet, author of Why the Constitution Matters For a fuller description of the book, in Griffin's own words, check out this recent Balkinization post. [read post]
4 May 2013, 7:40 am
Criminal copyright—but there are instances of one-to-one copying that a court wouldn’t find to be fair use but raise speech issues (see Tushnet). [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:30 pm
(Mark Tushnet recently posted a cautionary note of sorts, here.)Read more » [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:50 pm
Like Mark Tushnet, I find myself genuinely ambivalent about drone attacks. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 9:26 am
Over at Balkinization, Mark Tushnet has a few posts commenting and reflecting on a recent event at Harvard Law School, "Intellectual Diversity and the Legal Academy." [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm
However, apart from same mark/same goods, you had to show real confusion. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
Rebecca Tushnet: I do teach registration first. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 6:35 pm
Mark Tushnet has pointed out to me that he believes that someone like Anthony Kennedy is likely to vote for gay rights in the Marriage Cases--or at least not to vote on the merits against gay rights--because he doesn't want to be remembered as being like Henry Billings Brown, the author of Plessy v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Additional commentary comes from the editorial board of The New York Times, Mark Tushnet at Balkinization, and Miranda Leitsinger at NBC News. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 7:43 am
McCurdy, University of Virginia (on the “Ideological Origins of the Court-Packing Plan”)Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law School (on “Korematsu after September 11”)James F. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:19 am
Rebecca Tushnet (Georgetown Law Center) Norms no less than laws are products of power, and in studying nonlegal regimes for defining and defending creativity we should also be attentive to the power relations expressed, challenged, and reinforced in various fields of "IP without IP." [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:26 am
Over at Balkinization, Mark Tushnet has a note about the movie Lincoln, a character's reference to President Lincoln signing the Thirteenth Amendment, and the fact that a President need not, as with a bill, sign a constitutional amendment for it to take effect. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 6:30 pm
--Mark Tushnet, Harvard University As the world becomes more socially, industrially, governmentally, and technologically complex, it is increasingly implausible to imagine the protections of freedom of speech and press applying in exactly the same way in all contexts. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 8:50 am
Supreme Court’s failure to adopt any single foundational constitutional theory makes pragmatism the best descriptive characterization of the Court, as Mark Tushnet has suggested. [read post]
