Search for: "Mark Tushnet"
Results 141 - 160
of 984
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2021, 5:40 am
“The New York eviction moratorium decision and the problems of the shadow docket”: Mark Tushnet has this post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Linford: do we think of certain types of marks as innovative? [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 4:59 pm
This morning, I enjoyed reading Mark Tushnet's post at Balkinization. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm
Mark Tushnet might be emeritus, but he is still favoring with penetrating of readings of books of interest to legal historians. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 12:54 am
Chapter 4, by Rebecca Tushnet, identifies a number of issues that registration in trade mark law gives rise to and offers further potential solutions to bulging registers and overbroad registrations [earlier work here]. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:10 am
Barclay & Mark L. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
Rebecca Tushnet Slides. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 9:38 am
My Balkinization coblogger Mark Tushnet is unpersuaded by the argument of my book, Gay Rights vs. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 10:30 pm
Bookended by discussions of three books by legal liberals (Jack Balkin, Erwin Chemerinsky, Geoffrey Stone and David Strauss) and a book and article by progressive constitutional scholars (Mark Tushnet, David Pozen and Adam Samaha), this essay argues that legal liberalism today is intellectually exhausted. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:53 pm
Not Mark Tushnet. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
Other chapters cover specific nations, methodology, and specific legal concepts.Scholarship Comparative Constitutional Law: Elgar Research Reviews in Law (2017): Written by respected scholar Mark Tushnet, this book covers the most important scholarship from comparative constitutional law through 2016. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
In each filing, Rule 25.1(d) only allows parties to mark “up to fifteen (15) unique words (including numbers)” as confidential. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 12:01 pm
Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (2020). [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:20 am
Paul Horwitz (Alabama) flagged this "charming, useful, and insightful" dialogue between Mark Tushnet (Harvard) & Louis Michael Seidman (Georgetown), On Being Old Codgers: A Conversation about a Half Century in Legal Education: The conversation that follows, conducted over three evenings, captures some of our thoughts about the last half century... [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 8:27 am
Seidman and Tushnet. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:46 am
Via my colleague Will Baude on Twitter, I came across this interesting conversation between Louis Michael Seidman (Georgetown) and Mark Tushnet (Harvard) reflecting on their... [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 12:02 pm
Better than late than never, let me urge on readers this fine dialogue between Mark Tushnet and Louis Michael Seidman, On Being Old Codgers: A Conversation About a Half Century in Legal Academia. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
In combination, the array of racial restrictions imposed by law[,] crafted hierarchies of belonging, marked non-whites as unworthy of full citizenship, and created a form of ‘alien citizens’ defined by invented mythologies of racial difference propagated and imposed by whites. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 3:24 pm
As a result, one should expect continued violations of constitutional norms by American politicians to accomplish partisan goals—what Mark Tushnet has called “constitutional hardball”—at least until the electoral impact of demographic changes in the electorate exceeds the electoral impact of the rural favoritism that is built into the nation’s constitutional electoral processes. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:54 am
Wade (Nina Totenberg, NPR) Chief Justice John Roberts Lauds Courts’ Pandemic Response in Year-End Message (Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal) A Modest Proposal for Supreme Court Reform (Mark Tushnet, Balkinization) Dozens of Native Americans Could Get Out of Prison Because of This Supreme Court Decision (Kathleen Caulderwood & Gabrielle Caplan) In Virus Era, US Supreme Court Filings Fell 16% Year-Over-Year (Mike Scarcella, The National Law Journal) We rely on our… [read post]
