Search for: "Mark Tushnet"
Results 141 - 160
of 957
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
The night of the historic oral argument, Christine Farley of American University Washington College of Law hosted a discussion where I joined Rebecca Tushnet, Marty Schwimmer, and Cara Gagliano to recap the argument and discuss the case. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:11 pm
So you've read the Tushnet brief and the government's brief. [read post]
4 May 2020, 8:15 am
He interrupted the advocates at the two-minute mark, even mid-sentence. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:21 am
Austria: The Folly of Europe, [Abstract], 5 Journal of Global Justice & Public Policy 83-105 (2019).Mark Tushnet, Trump v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm
referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1275&context=caselrev Mark Tushnet, “Law and Prudence in the law of Judiciability: The Transformation and Disappearance of the Political Question Doctrine, North Carolina Law Review (2002), https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
When asked on a press call why Facebook was treating COVID-19 misinformation differently, Mark Zuckerberg invoked the First Amendment trope that “you can’t yell fire in a crowded theater. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:00 pm
New Book Chapter: Mark Tushnet, The Inadequacy of Judicial Enforcement of Constitutional Rights Provisions to Rectify Economic Inequality, and the Inevitability of the Attempt, in Judicial Review: Process, Powers and Problems (Cambridge University Press 2020, eds. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet One consideration in how we should structure the regime is that casual empiricism is a pervasive and possibly unsolvable problem because courts don’t notice when they’re making empirical claims: SCt cases (even in Tam, on registration as endorsement). [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 8:43 am
Here I add a supplemental "note" to Tushnet's supplemental note. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:06 am
Tushnet with a foreword by Randall Kennedy. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:56 pm
In related discussion, at “Balkinization,” Mark Tushnet has a post titled “Law Clerks and Jurisprudence. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Cox is a good case: they failed to enforce even a toothless repeat infringer policy.Professor Rebecca Tushnet, Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment, Harvard Law SchoolDownload TestimonyI would like to start with some perhaps surprising numbers that illustrate what §512 has meant for creativity and innovation online. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 11:44 am
The DMCA is 22 years old this year and the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property is marking that occasion with a series of hearings reviewing the law and inviting ideas for “reform. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm
”—Mark Tushnet“This is a sensitive analysis of the moral imagination behind the Indian Constitution, a document intended to free the democratic process from sectarian identities and to strengthen centralized state power. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 8:33 pm
Only Mark Tushnet at that time had the wisdom to suggest that the correct answer might be "the whole thing. [read post]
The problematics of impeachment (I): The specific problems of Charles Black's take on the presidency
29 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
Like Mark Tushnet (I think), I'm really skeptical. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm
As America’s longest-serving member of Congress once said, “I'll let you write the substance … and you let me write the procedure, and I'll screw you every time. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:56 am
Mark Tushnet flagged a related point at Balkin: Here's the version from the House: "Overwhelming evidence shows that President Trump solicited these two investigations in order to obtain a personal political benefit, not because the investigations served the national interest. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm
” The announced speakers are Vincent Brown, Annette Gordon-Reed, Jane Kamensky, Jill Lepore, David Moss, and Mark Tushnet. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 7:22 am
The Lanham Act defines a “counterfeit” as “a spurious mark which is identical with, or substantially indistinguishable from, a registered mark. [read post]
