Search for: "Mark v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2015, 10:00 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Social Security disability pressure eased by budget compromise, October 28, 2015, NOLA, by Mark Schleifstein More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
The post Considerations When Applying for Social Security Disability for PTSD appeared first on Social Security Disability Lawyer Blog. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:23 am
According to the Court, The Social Security Administration (SSA) Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) who rejected Ms. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Alice C. Hill, Jane Chong
On the one hand, these developments could mark an abrupt and chilling about-face from where we were just three months ago. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:33 pm by Sme
Social Security Administration (10th Cir., June 20, 2017) (affirming denial of social security benefits because Bell inadequately briefed her case: her arguments were little more than cursory statements without analysis)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 6:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
You can receive disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act if you suffer a physical or workplace injury and cannot perform any long-lasting substantial gainful activity. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:28 pm by Sme
COLVIN (10th Cir., October 20, 2015) (affirming denial of social security benefits)*PHAM v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am by David Kris
In April 2020, the State Department designated the Russian Imperial Movement (RIM) as a terrorist group, marking the “first time the United States has ever designated white supremacist terrorists. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:55 am by Kathryn Moore
Section 405(g) of the Social Security Act allows for judicial review of “any final decision … made after a hearing” by the Social Security Administration. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by Tim Springer
Food for Thought: The Social Security Administration brought its own experts to comment on our client’s complaints. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm by Ronald Mann
Mark Perry (appearing on behalf of Lucia to challenge the appointments) tried repeatedly to limit the breadth of his argument to a small group of only 150 administrative law judges scattered around the federal government, suggesting that the court’s decision would apply only to cases of wholly adversarial adjudication – a group from which he pointedly tried to exclude Social Security adjudications. [read post]
District Court Judge Mark Kravitz on the topic of medical expert testimony by telephone at a Social Security disability hearing. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., January 4, 2016) (affirming Social Security Administration determination that the plaintiff was not disabled)*Collins v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
The second and third grounds concerned breaches of the principles of equal treatment and good administration respectively. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:24 am
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA) have teamed up to offer employers E-Verify. [read post]