Search for: "Market Company v. Hoffman"
Results 1 - 20
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Hoffman v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:27 pm
It lets an insurance company totally take away legitimate coverage by inserting a clause that is completely unnecessary and contrary to how insurance policies have been interpreted and applied by California courts for fifty-plus years.Does an insurance company have to cover uncovered claims? [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:44 pm
As discussed further below, this can pose a challenge for companies of all types advertising through affiliate marketing programs.In the FTC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
Stupak v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
Those two worlds, that of the discrete private dealer and the hurly-burly of the art world capital markets, came into sharp legal contrast in late December 2013 with the federal jury trial in Marguerite Hoffman v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 3:48 pm
Celltrion Healthcare v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 5:30 pm
Over on LXBN, Zosha has a piece on these interesting—to put it kindly—companies. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:07 am
Here is how the federal district judge who has this case did that in this opinion, based on evidence presented at a hearing: In September of 2006, Lawrence Hoffman, owner of The Hoffman Group, [a manufacturer and distributor of after-market auto parts], discovered a product for sale on eBay that looked like a type of part his company sold. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:55 pm
(C-85/76 Hoffman-La Roche v Commission [1979] ECR 461). [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 3:25 pm
Andrew Hoffman contributed to this post. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
It is among the 100 largest U.S. companies by market capitalization and reported almost $26 billion in net revenue in fiscal 2017. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:38 am
My ruminations over an interesting ECJ ruling of 11 December 2008, which might open new perspectives in the area of exploitative abuses: In Kanal 5 Ltd, TV 4 AB v (STIM) upa, C-52/07, the ECJ had to determine whether (i) the royalties charged by the swedish collecting society to broadcast companies were excessively high, hence abusive under Article 82 (a) EC ; and (ii) whether the different fee formula applicable on the one hand, to a public broadcast company and,… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:40 pm
Supreme Court released its decision today in Sorrell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:55 am
Supreme Court in Sorrell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:05 am
David Hoffman graciously invited me back to comment on the Bear Stearns meltdown. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:57 pm
About the Authors: Stephen V. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 7:37 pm
See the Lenz v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 11:53 am
Intransit Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:37 am
In Aveling Barford v Perion Ltd, [1989] 5 BCC 677, Hoffman J. had held that “it is the fact that it was known and intended to be a sale at an undervalue which made it an unlawful distribution. [read post]
