Search for: "Marks v. Goodding" Results 1 - 20 of 12,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am by Neil Wilkof
Kat friends Beatrice Wee and Hong Qibin examine the case of Burberry Ltd v Megastar Shipping Pte Ltd , in which the Singapore Court of Appeal held that as far as a freight forwarder was concerned, an alleged infringer is only liable for trade mark infringement under section 27 of Singapore’s Trade Marks Act (“TMA”) if it had knowledge or reason to believe that a sign had been affixed on the goods in question. [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:52 am
In Daimler AG v Sany Group Company Ltd [2009] EWHC 1003 (Ch) (14 May 2009) the registered proprietor of the following marks sought injunctions and other relief against Sany Group Co. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:15 am by Marcel Pemsel
Against this background, the General Court dealt with the question whether a trade mark enjoying a reputation for bread in Spain can successfully oppose a highly similar mark for bicycles and related goods in the recent judgment Bimbo v EUIPO - Bottari Europe (BimboBIKE) (case T-509/22). [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 6:33 am
In my recently published book, The Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 2:15 am by Nedim Malovic
However, since some of the goods covered by the marks are aimed primarily at a public of professionals, the level of attention of that public (with regard to those goods) will be higher than that of the general public (T-449/15, Satkirit Holdings v OHIM).Comparison of the goodsAs regards the assessment of lighting mixers in Class 9 covered by the earlier mark and the goods in Class 11 covered by the Applicant’s mark, the General… [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 11:50 pm by Neil Wilkof
In its judgment Hasco TM v EUIPO - Esi (NATURCAPS), the General Court dealt with the question whether such regulatory definitions play a role in interpreting the meaning of a term in the list of goods and services. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:04 am by war
In two ex parte applications, Greenwood J granted interlocutory injunctions restraining Customs from releasing imported goods which allegedly infringe a trade mark. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:24 am by Marcel Pemsel
Applying for the right kind of mark is crucial for successfully defending the trade mark, as the recent General Court judgment in DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem v EUIPO - Užstato sistemos administratorius (case T-774/21) shows. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 1:52 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Mark Killenbeck, author of several excellent legal histories, including one on M’Culloch v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 1:32 am
This question arose in the recent Singapore case of FMTM Distribution Limited v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:42 pm by Durga Rao Vanayam
v=XjjC2YNpb18Shri M.P.Vijaya Kumar has right in his statement that one can have any amount of knowledge, but, the same may not materialize in getting marks unless one is good at the art of writing the examination. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:06 pm by Peter Groves
Repackaging goods sold under a trade mark, and bundling them for resale with third party products, can infringe the trade mark. [read post]