Search for: "Marks v. Goodding" Results 1 - 20 of 9,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am by Neil Wilkof
Kat friends Beatrice Wee and Hong Qibin examine the case of Burberry Ltd v Megastar Shipping Pte Ltd , in which the Singapore Court of Appeal held that as far as a freight forwarder was concerned, an alleged infringer is only liable for trade mark infringement under section 27 of Singapore’s Trade Marks Act (“TMA”) if it had knowledge or reason to believe that a sign had been affixed on the goods in question. [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:52 am
In Daimler AG v Sany Group Company Ltd [2009] EWHC 1003 (Ch) (14 May 2009) the registered proprietor of the following marks sought injunctions and other relief against Sany Group Co. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 6:33 am
In my recently published book, The Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 2:15 am by Nedim Malovic
However, since some of the goods covered by the marks are aimed primarily at a public of professionals, the level of attention of that public (with regard to those goods) will be higher than that of the general public (T-449/15, Satkirit Holdings v OHIM).Comparison of the goodsAs regards the assessment of lighting mixers in Class 9 covered by the earlier mark and the goods in Class 11 covered by the Applicant’s mark, the General… [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 1:52 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Mark Killenbeck, author of several excellent legal histories, including one on M’Culloch v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 1:32 am
This question arose in the recent Singapore case of FMTM Distribution Limited v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:06 pm by Peter Groves
Repackaging goods sold under a trade mark, and bundling them for resale with third party products, can infringe the trade mark. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
     The designThe case concerned is Chen v OHMI - AM Denmark (Dispositif de nettoyage), T-55/12  of 25 April 2013 and can be retrieved here. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:31 am
It just a few months ago that this blog reported on the Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev in the Sky v SkyKick, C-371/18 case.important A referral from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales made by Arnold J (as he then was), the Sky case is probably the most important referral in the EU trade mark field made over the past few years. [read post]