Search for: "Marks v. Goodding" Results 61 - 80 of 12,072
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
It is time for some seasonal trade mark fizz. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:55 am by Duets Guest Blogger
The principle of free movement of goods must therefore be balanced against the protection of the relevant trade mark. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
Yes, indeed, it's time to take a look at Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co.Mark 6 So what's this case about? [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:35 am
 Damage: Tarnishing & Dilution The hearing officer rejected the claim that there was any detriment to the repute of the earlier marks, as there was nothing inherent in the applied for goods/services or the mark itself that would create a negative connotation that would rub off on the earlier mark, nor was there any evidence to suggest that the applicant’s goods and services will be inferior in any way...It's a no from… [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
Trade mark dilution has not been found in the U.S. when  a famous mark is used for parody (Louis Vuitton Malletier v Haute Diggity Dog, LLC., 464 F. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:28 am
 Indeed, after Vorsprung durch Technik crawled past the finishing post and into the Community trade marks register in Case C-398/08 P Audi AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market a mere seven years after its application was filed, many of us thought there wasn't much else to discuss on the topic. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
Rothschild, Case No. 1:22-cv-00384, related to trade mark infringement and the sale of NFTs of “MetaBirkins” -pending: motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint denied-; Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:20 am
Silberquelle GmbH v Maselli-Strickmode GmbH (Case C-495/07); WLR(D) 6 “Where the proprietor of a trade mark affixed the mark to items that it gave free of charge to purchasers of its goods, it did not make genuine use of the mark so far as those items were concerned, for the purpose of, inter alia, art [...] [read post]
1 May 2008, 9:05 am
The major exception to this limit on damages is through marking of goods. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
 The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) found that Unilever had sold large quantities of and publicised the goods designated by its Community word mark IMPULSE in the United Kingdom and Italy, with that mark enjoying a 5% market share in the United Kingdom and a 0.2% market share in Italy [the product seems to be some sort of perfumed and/or deodorant body spray]. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
Distinctiveness must be assessed by reference to the mark taken in its entirety, the goods and services covered by the mark and the relevant public's perception of the mark. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 3:37 pm
By contrast, the goods covered by Hartmann’s trade marks fulfilled an impermeable function to deal with urinary or faecal leakage. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 10:43 am
AUDI’s case was that Lim’s specification is overwhelmingly broad in reproducing the entire list of Class 12 goods in the Alphabetical List of the Nice Classification, and clearly it cannot be a realistic or bona fide intention to use the mark for all the goods. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]