Search for: "Marks v. Goodding" Results 81 - 100 of 12,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2017, 6:47 am
First, it must be assessed by reference to the goods / services for which registration is sought and the appearance of the mark must convey trade mark significance. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:23 pm
They also love celebrities, soaps operas, staying positive and free speech, which is why Simone Kelly-Brown and OWN Your Power Communications, Inc v Oprah Winfrey et al, No. 12-1207-cv is such a tasty compendium of American tastes and obsessions, with a bit of trade mark law thrown in for good measure. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:14 am
Yet, it was not until the Federal Circuit's decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Darren
South African case law that has referred to European decisions that have caused the UKIPO to summarise the Principles as they have been referred to above include Adcock Ingram v Cipla Medpro (Sabel v Puma), Laugh it off Promotions v SAB (Canon v MGM), Puma v Global Warming (Marca Mode v Adidas) and Cowbell v ICS Holdings (Canon v MGM). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:55 am
Further, the Board found that the mark applied for did not indicate the commercial origin of the goods. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
The TTAB cited the recent Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Brunetti was the respondent in the 2019 Supreme Court case, Iancu v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:06 am
Wise F&I, LLC; Financial Gap, Administrator LLC; Vehicle Service Administrator LLC; and Administration America LLC v. [read post]