Search for: "Marriage of Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 1,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2014, 9:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
That is a conclusion that the state seems sure to challenge in its appeal, since it had raised it before Judge Smith, and also in same-sex marriage cases in Missouri state courts. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 9:35 am by Mark Keenan
Mr Duncan Smith said research suggested young people had "incredibly high expectations" of marriage. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 8:50 am
The most active questioners, Lippman, Smith and Pigott, all seemed very concerned about limiting the scope of the ruling. [read post]
18 May 2012, 2:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
David Morgan Smith - Click here for more information on David Smith. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court (see prior posting), certiorari petitions have been filed in two more same-sex marriage cases:A petition (full text) was filed Aug. 6 in Smith v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:50 pm
While the California Supreme Court has legalized same-sex marriage (see prior posting), San Diego county will not force objecting employees to perform same-sex ceremonies. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 1:08 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Please contact Arnold & Smith, PLLC today at (855) 370-2828 or find additional resources here. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 11:39 am
And a "commitment ceremony" like Smith had with Howard Stern isn't a legal document without a marriage license. 1. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:25 am by Rick Hasen
  I’ll only add that I’ve looked at the evidence in the most highly controversial cases, involving gay marriage measures, and there is no evidence that campaign contributors face any kind of serious harassment like the SWATing example brought forward by Smith. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 6:05 am
Howard Marshall's will left his $1.6 billion fortune to Pierce Marshall, but Smith challenged the will, saying her husband had promised her millions during their one-year marriage. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:41 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Does adultery affect my divorce case? [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am by Thomas C. Berg - Guest
Smith (1990), and the California Supreme Court, under the state constitution, have held that courts should not order an accommodation from “laws of general applicability” that are formally neutral toward religion. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:13 am by Lyle Denniston
Smith to hold a conference to discuss the status of the federal case “in light of ongoing state litigation. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:00 am by Jana Singer
Smith established that “a law that is neutral and of general applicability need not be justified by a compelling government interest even if the law has the incidental effect of burdening a particular religious practice. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm by Erwin Chemerinsky
Smith (1990) has held that religious beliefs are not an excuse from general laws. [read post]