Search for: "Marriage of Smith"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2020, 9:30 pm
Over at the Legal History Miscellany: marriage and murder in 13th-c. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 5:44 pm
Andika Wahab, The state of human rights disclosure among sustainably certified palm oil companies in Malaysia Ian Turner, Conceptualising a protection of liberal constitutionalism post 9/11: an emphasis upon rights in the social contract philosophy of Thomas Hobbes Miriam Cohen, Doing business abroad: a review of selected recent Canadian case-studies on corporate accountability for foreign human rights violations icle Julie Ada Tchoukou, Religion as an ideological weapon and the feminisation of… [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 6:39 am
” In re Marriage of Smith, 86 Ill. 2d 518, 527 (Ill. 1981) 750 ILCS 5/503(a) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act lists the various exceptions to the rule: If you got it after the marriage date…it’s marital property. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
CSS’s refusal to certify children to couples in same-sex marriages? [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm
Smith. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 10:32 am
Hodges striking down state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 5:30 am
You can't say that marriage is the union between one man and one woman. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm
[He talked about COVID and Religious Liberty, the Second Amendment, Free Speech, and "Bullying" of the Supreme Court by U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
My views on Smith are no secret; Justice Scalia called me Smith's most prominent academic critic. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
In my post yesterday, I suggested that the case might possibly turn on a rather narrow, fact-dependent question--namely, whether the City has discriminated against CSS on the basis of its religious opposition to same-sex marriage. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
Same-Sex Marriage and Interracial Marriage Throughout the arguments, several Justices brought up the Loving question. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:02 pm
Smith, neutral laws of general applicability do not violate the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
Smith, the free exercise case that is at stake in Fulton. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:36 pm
” But, he continued, the court has never said anything similar about interracial marriage. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm
Later this morning, the Supreme Court will hear argument in the most significant Religion Clause case of the Term, Fulton v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:52 am
One consents to marriage and to acts of physical intimacy, for example. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
Smith remains good law, perhaps certain spheres of liberty where government did not interfere with religious practice during the Founding period operate as an exception to Smith's deferential rule. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 1:42 pm
Smith was written by conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
Smith, the basis of contemporary free exercise law. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 8:16 am
Smith — which held that “neutral laws of general applicability” generally do not violate the free exercise clause — and bring much-needed revitalization to free-exercise jurisprudence. [read post]
