Search for: "Marrs v. People" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The Court confirmed that the trial judge was correct to hold that such allegations would tend to have a substantial adverse effect (Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Limited [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) [98]) on the way that people would treat Mr Millet. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:00 am by Ruth Bird
In April a decision was taken by a BBC journalist, Andrew Marr, to reveal that he had taken out a super injunction some years ago to prevent publication of a story of an affair. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Larkin Reynolds
As Jack and Steve have both noted, yesterday the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Lebron v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
 This could result in no postponement of limitation periods for people involved in motor vehicle accidents in which vehiclar damage occurs. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
Then adding to the controversy was the decision of the former “gagger” Andrew Marr to break the terms of his own injunction and reveal himself as being responsible from preventing the reporting of his own extra marital affair. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
  Corbyn v Millett [2021] EWCA Civ 567 The respondent issued defamation proceedings against Jeremy Corbyn in respect of an interview he gave on the Andrew Marr Show in which he had referred to people in the audience as “Zionists” who “don’t understand English irony”. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:38 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Johnson savaged by Mair Like many people I particularly enjoyed the extraordinary savaging that Boris Johnson received at the hands of Eddie Mair on BBC 1s Andrew Marr show last Sunday. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Ms Houston had argued that her treatment was reminiscent of the Holocaust, when good people accepted an unacceptable regime. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
  The Jewish Chronicle had a piece “Libel case begins over Corbyn’s ‘English irony’ interview with Marr”. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am by INFORRM
The most high profile privacy story of the week was Andrew Marr’s decision to “out” himself as a privacy claimant – speaking to the “Daily Mail“. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
“The reasonable person”, wrote Justices Claire L’Heureux-Dubé and Beverley McLachlin in R. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am by Jon L. Gelman
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
“ May 2011 BBC journalist Andrew Marr outed himself as a privacy claimant – in the Daily Mail. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am by INFORRM
Presenters often appear to be ill-briefed and insufficiently armed with the facts necessary to challenge assertions made by interviewees in live interviews, reflecting not just pressure on them but a lack of understanding by programme researchers and producers He also pointed to ‘evidence of a misunderstanding of the political process in the EU’, drawing attention in particular to written evidence submitted by the Labour Party which stated that ‘too often it seems that you report… [read post]