Search for: "Marrs v. People"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
” [22] On January 17, 2014, during an interview with the british interviewer Andrew Marr, Vladimir Putin said that the law “does not discriminate against gay people” [23]. [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:10 am
Marrs (Kan. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
In doing so, he actually hurt many people. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm
Corbyn v Millett [2021] EWCA Civ 567 The respondent issued defamation proceedings against Jeremy Corbyn in respect of an interview he gave on the Andrew Marr Show in which he had referred to people in the audience as “Zionists” who “don’t understand English irony”. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 1:29 pm
(S.E.C. v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm
The Court confirmed that the trial judge was correct to hold that such allegations would tend to have a substantial adverse effect (Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Limited [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) [98]) on the way that people would treat Mr Millet. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
” Minor v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm
The Jewish Chronicle had a piece “Libel case begins over Corbyn’s ‘English irony’ interview with Marr”. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
Yero v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
Ms Houston had argued that her treatment was reminiscent of the Holocaust, when good people accepted an unacceptable regime. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
In doing so, he actually hurt people. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
“The reasonable person”, wrote Justices Claire L’Heureux-Dubé and Beverley McLachlin in R. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
Presenters often appear to be ill-briefed and insufficiently armed with the facts necessary to challenge assertions made by interviewees in live interviews, reflecting not just pressure on them but a lack of understanding by programme researchers and producers He also pointed to ‘evidence of a misunderstanding of the political process in the EU’, drawing attention in particular to written evidence submitted by the Labour Party which stated that ‘too often it seems that you report… [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:38 am
Johnson savaged by Mair Like many people I particularly enjoyed the extraordinary savaging that Boris Johnson received at the hands of Eddie Mair on BBC 1s Andrew Marr show last Sunday. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
As Jack and Steve have both noted, yesterday the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Lebron v. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
“ May 2011 BBC journalist Andrew Marr outed himself as a privacy claimant – in the Daily Mail. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:58 am
Or um Andrew Marr. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am
Then adding to the controversy was the decision of the former “gagger” Andrew Marr to break the terms of his own injunction and reveal himself as being responsible from preventing the reporting of his own extra marital affair. [read post]
