Search for: "Marshall v. Bruce" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2019, 5:11 am
Vinyl Record Author Evan-AmosLicence Dedicated to the public by the authorSource Phonograph Record Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Hacon) FBT Productions, LLC v Let Them Eat Vinyl Distribution Ltd and another [2019] EWHC 829 (IPEC) This was a claim for infringement of copyright in the sound recording of an album called Infinite by Marshall Bruce [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am by Nicholas Mosvick
On February 24, 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall issued the Supreme Court’s decision in Marbury v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Michael C. Smith
with paternal advice from Bruce Sostek of Thompson Knight and a certain local counsel for a successful result on behalf of our client Pier 1 Imports in the Alexsam v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
This excerpt chronicles Donald’s journey to defend Mi’kmaw treaty rights in the Supreme Court of Canada and sets the stage for understanding the impacts of R. v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
After 1967, when Thurgood Marshall replaces Tom Clark, there are six liberal votes on most [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 8:24 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)Social media behemoth Facebook and an Oregon ad agency have been sued for copyright infringement [17 U.S.C. sec. 101 et seq.] in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by the company that licenses and manages the music of 40-year-old rapper/songwriter Eminem (Marshall Bruce Mathers III).In the Complaint filed May 20, Eight Mile Style, LLC & Martin Affiliated LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:05 am
[long footnote omitted] As it happens, however, Chief Justice John Marshall did not agree. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:03 pm by David Bernstein
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court did, in fact, adhere to a “libertarian philosophy” in one race case, Buchanan v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:08 am
Yeh, well, okay, so I overdid it--an absence of sobriety in the marshalling of railroad receivership statistics. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:12 am
This is a group effort of four attorneys – John Gihon, Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper & Bruce Buchanan. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:12 am
This is a group effort of four attorneys – John Gihon, Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper & Bruce Buchanan. [read post]