Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia Government" Results 1 - 20 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2017, 7:19 am by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:13 am by INFORRM
The District Court had issued a preliminary injunction in recognition of a significant public interest in upholding the Plaintiffs’ First Amendment right to observe government conduct during protests. [read post]
Attorney for the District of Columbia Erik Kenerson relied heavily on the activities cited in the government’s filings in arguing that Butina was an agent of the Russian government and that, as such, she posed too great a flight risk to be let out on bail. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Amanda L. Tyler
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Ed Stein
Roberts], where it upheld a statute that levied property taxes in the District of Columbia to support railroad projects. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am by Jeremy Gordon
” In a lengthy footnote, it addresses perhaps the most powerful case marshalled by McKeever in support of his position: Haldeman v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm by Toby Heytens and Martine Cicconi
Heytens is solicitor general and Martine Cicconi is deputy solicitor general of the Commonwealth of Virginia, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of 15 states and the District of Columbia in support of the respondent in Trump v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Russell Spivak
District Court for the District of Columbia on Feb. 22: a Joint Status Report (alongside the Department of Justice), a motion in limine, and a prehearing brief. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:23 am by Michelle Buhalo
Officially, the federal government calls Presidents' Day "Washington's Birthday" and at the time of its original enactment in 1879 (20 Stat. 277) it was celebrated on February 22 as a holiday for federal employees in the District of Columbia. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:28 am
It seems reasonable to read the words "such jurisdiction" in the phrase as referring back to the jurisdiction in which the judge is sitting; i.e., in this case, the District of Columbia, since the provision mentions no other jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 2:38 pm by Jim Gerl
Some important circuit court decisions: Marshall Joint Sch Dist No 2 v. [read post]