Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia Government" Results 1 - 20 of 194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decision puts a hold on the limited gag order to give the judges time to consider Trump’s request for a longer pause on the restrictions while his appeals play out. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 10:15 am by Garrett West
  The panel also rejected the district court’s conclusion that the District of Columbia’s legislation extending the statute of limitations for appellant’s claims violated the separation of powers by altering a final judgment, and for the same basic reason:  the District of Columbia did not “revive finally adjudicated claims” by amending the limitations period because the complaint had been dismissed without… [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
District of Columbia, 670 F.3d 1244 (D.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
Ten years later, while in private practice, he defended the constitutionality of a District of Columbia gun-control measure in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ever since the Court’s watershed decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:40 pm by Anna Bower
A few minutes later, the marshals nail a second victim. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In October 1945, during her second year at Columbia Law School, future United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Thurgood Marshall hired her as a law clerk. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]